Ah, Cython objects. Didn't think of that. More below.
On 04/14/2012 11:02 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
Hi,
thanks for writing this up. Comments inline as I read through it.
Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 14.04.2012 21:08:
each described by a function pointer and a signature specification
string, such as "
Robert Bradshaw, 15.04.2012 08:32:
> On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 11:16 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> Robert Bradshaw, 15.04.2012 07:59:
>>> On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 2:00 PM, mark florisson wrote:
There may be a lot of promotion/demotion (you likely only want the
former) combinations, especially
Robert Bradshaw, 15.04.2012 08:27:
> On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> While overloaded signatures are great for the callee, they make things much
>> more complicated for the caller. It's no longer just one signature that
>> either matches or not. Especially when we allow mor
On 04/15/2012 08:16 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
Robert Bradshaw, 15.04.2012 07:59:
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 2:00 PM, mark florisson wrote:
There may be a lot of promotion/demotion (you likely only want the
former) combinations, especially for multiple arguments, so perhaps it
makes sense to limit o
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 11:16 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Robert Bradshaw, 15.04.2012 07:59:
>> On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 2:00 PM, mark florisson wrote:
>>> There may be a lot of promotion/demotion (you likely only want the
>>> former) combinations, especially for multiple arguments, so perhaps it
>>
Greg Ewing, 15.04.2012 03:07:
> Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
>
>> if (obj has signature "id)i") {
>
> This is an aside, but is it really necessary to define the
> signature syntax in a way that involves unmatched parens?
> Some editors (such as the one I like to use) get confused
> by this, even w
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks for writing this up. Comments inline as I read through it.
>
> Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 14.04.2012 21:08:
>> === GIL-less accesss ===
>>
>> It is OK to access the native-call table without holding the GIL. This
>> should of course
mark florisson, 14.04.2012 23:15:
> On 14 April 2012 22:02, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 14.04.2012 21:08:
>>> * TBD: Support for Cython-specific constructs like memoryview slices
>>>(so that arrays with strides and shape can be passed faster than
>>>passing an {{{"O"}}}).
Robert Bradshaw, 15.04.2012 07:59:
> On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 2:00 PM, mark florisson wrote:
>> There may be a lot of promotion/demotion (you likely only want the
>> former) combinations, especially for multiple arguments, so perhaps it
>> makes sense to limit ourselves a bit. For instance for numer
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Greg Ewing wrote:
> Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>
>> Has anyone done any experiments/timings to see if having constants vs.
>> globals even matters?
>
>
> My gut feeling is that one extra memory read is going to be
> insignificant compared to the time taken by the call
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 2:00 PM, mark florisson
wrote:
> On 14 April 2012 20:08, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
> wrote:
>> On 04/13/2012 12:11 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
>>>
>>> Travis Oliphant recently raised the issue on the NumPy list of what
>>> mechanisms to use to box native functions produced
Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
if (obj has signature "id)i") {
This is an aside, but is it really necessary to define the
signature syntax in a way that involves unmatched parens?
Some editors (such as the one I like to use) get confused
by this, even when they're inside quotes.
The answer "get
Robert Bradshaw wrote:
Has anyone done any experiments/timings to see if having constants vs.
globals even matters?
My gut feeling is that one extra memory read is going to be
insignificant compared to the time taken by the call itself
and whatever it does. But of course gut feelings are alway
Stefan Behnel wrote:
>mark florisson, 14.04.2012 23:00:
>> On 14 April 2012 20:08, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
>>> * TBD: Information about GIL requirements (nogil, with gil?), how
>>> exceptions are reported
>>
>> Maybe that could be a separate list, to be consulted mostly for
>> explicit
On 14 April 2012 22:21, mark florisson wrote:
> On 14 April 2012 22:13, Wes McKinney wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 11:32 AM, mark florisson
>> wrote:
>>> On 14 April 2012 14:57, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
>>> wrote:
On 04/14/2012 12:46 PM, mark florisson wrote:
>
> On 12 April 2012
On 14 April 2012 22:13, Wes McKinney wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 11:32 AM, mark florisson
> wrote:
>> On 14 April 2012 14:57, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
>> wrote:
>>> On 04/14/2012 12:46 PM, mark florisson wrote:
On 12 April 2012 22:00, Wes McKinney wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 12,
On 14 April 2012 22:02, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks for writing this up. Comments inline as I read through it.
>
> Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 14.04.2012 21:08:
>> === GIL-less accesss ===
>>
>> It is OK to access the native-call table without holding the GIL. This
>> should of course only be
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 11:32 AM, mark florisson
wrote:
> On 14 April 2012 14:57, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
> wrote:
>> On 04/14/2012 12:46 PM, mark florisson wrote:
>>>
>>> On 12 April 2012 22:00, Wes McKinney wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 10:38 AM, mark florisson
wrote:
>
>>>
mark florisson, 14.04.2012 23:00:
> On 14 April 2012 20:08, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
>> * TBD: Information about GIL requirements (nogil, with gil?), how
>> exceptions are reported
>
> Maybe that could be a separate list, to be consulted mostly for
> explicit casts (I think PyErr_Occurred()
Hi,
thanks for writing this up. Comments inline as I read through it.
Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 14.04.2012 21:08:
> === GIL-less accesss ===
>
> It is OK to access the native-call table without holding the GIL. This
> should of course only be used to call functions that state in their
> signature th
On 14 April 2012 20:08, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
> On 04/13/2012 12:11 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
>>
>> Travis Oliphant recently raised the issue on the NumPy list of what
>> mechanisms to use to box native functions produced by his Numba so that
>> SciPy functions can call it, e.g. (I'm m
On 04/13/2012 12:11 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
Travis Oliphant recently raised the issue on the NumPy list of what
mechanisms to use to box native functions produced by his Numba so that
SciPy functions can call it, e.g. (I'm making the numba part up):
This thread is turning into one of t
On 04/14/2012 08:10 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 1:56 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 14.04.2012 10:41:
Greg Ewing wrote:
Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
1) It doesn't work well with multiple interpreter states. Ok, nothing
works with that at the moment, but
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 1:56 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 14.04.2012 10:41:
>> Greg Ewing wrote:
>>> Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
>>>
1) It doesn't work well with multiple interpreter states. Ok, nothing
works with that at the moment, but it is on the roadmap for Pytho
On 14 April 2012 14:57, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
> On 04/14/2012 12:46 PM, mark florisson wrote:
>>
>> On 12 April 2012 22:00, Wes McKinney wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 10:38 AM, mark florisson
>>> wrote:
Yet another release candidate, this will hopefully be the last befo
mark florisson, 14.04.2012 13:02:
> I just pushed a fix here:
> https://github.com/markflorisson88/cython/tree/release
Note that I had already pushed a couple of other fixes into the release
branch of the main repo.
Stefan
___
cython-devel mailing list
On 04/14/2012 12:46 PM, mark florisson wrote:
On 12 April 2012 22:00, Wes McKinney wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 10:38 AM, mark florisson
wrote:
Yet another release candidate, this will hopefully be the last before
the 0.16 release. You can grab it from here:
http://wiki.cython.org/ReleaseN
Original-Message
From: William Stein (wstein a gmail.com)
Hi,
As previously announced a few times, the sage.math cluster is OFF, due
to a electrical work that is being done in the building that houses
the server room. I expect the machines to be off until about 9:30am.
Obviou
On 14 April 2012 12:00, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis, 14.04.2012 12:16:
>> 4 tests still fail with Python 3.2 (currently 3.2.3).
>> All tests pass with Python 2.6.8, 2.7.3 and 3.1.5.
>
> Thanks for the report.
>
Indeed, I just pushed a fix here:
https://github.com/ma
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis, 14.04.2012 12:16:
> 4 tests still fail with Python 3.2 (currently 3.2.3).
> All tests pass with Python 2.6.8, 2.7.3 and 3.1.5.
Thanks for the report.
> Failures with Python 3.2:
>
> ==
> FAI
On 12 April 2012 22:00, Wes McKinney wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 10:38 AM, mark florisson
> wrote:
>> Yet another release candidate, this will hopefully be the last before
>> the 0.16 release. You can grab it from here:
>> http://wiki.cython.org/ReleaseNotes-0.16
>>
>> There were several fix
2012-04-12 16:38:37 mark florisson napisał(a):
> Yet another release candidate, this will hopefully be the last before
> the 0.16 release. You can grab it from here:
> http://wiki.cython.org/ReleaseNotes-0.16
>
> There were several fixes for the numpy attribute rewrite, memoryviews
> and fused typ
Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 14.04.2012 10:41:
> Greg Ewing wrote:
>> Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
>>
>>> 1) It doesn't work well with multiple interpreter states. Ok, nothing
>>> works with that at the moment, but it is on the roadmap for Python
>>
>> Is it really? I got the impression that it's not consi
Greg Ewing wrote:
>Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
>
>> 1) It doesn't work well with multiple interpreter states. Ok, nothing
>works
>> with that at the moment, but it is on the roadmap for Python
>
>Is it really? I got the impression that it's not considered feasible,
>since it would require massi
Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Nathaniel Smith
>wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 9:27 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
> Ah, I didn't think about 6-bit o
35 matches
Mail list logo
