Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 13.04.2012 00:34:
> On 04/13/2012 12:11 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
>> Travis Oliphant recently raised the issue on the NumPy list of what
>> mechanisms to use to box native functions produced by his Numba so that
>> SciPy functions can call it, e.g. (I'm making the numba
Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 12.04.2012 23:32:
> (We should obviously start to tell people which git branch to fetch in
> addition to the tarball.
+1
> And perhaps create a "devel" branch and let master
> be betas and release candidates.)
-1
I think we should just always merge release branches back in
mark florisson, 12.04.2012 20:21:
> Could we run the pyregr test suite manually instead of automatically?
> It takes a lot of resources to build, and a single simple push to the
> cython-devel branch results in the build slots being hogged for hours,
Careful here. It takes a lot of time, yes, but
Robert Bradshaw, 12.04.2012 22:21:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 11:21 AM, mark florisson wrote:
>> Could we run the pyregr test suite manually instead of automatically?
>> It takes a lot of resources to build, and a single simple push to the
>> cython-devel branch results in the build slots being hogg
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
> On 04/13/2012 12:11 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
>>
>> Travis Oliphant recently raised the issue on the NumPy list of what
>> mechanisms to use to box native functions produced by his Numba so that
>> SciPy functions can call it, e.
On 04/13/2012 12:11 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
Travis Oliphant recently raised the issue on the NumPy list of what
mechanisms to use to box native functions produced by his Numba so that
SciPy functions can call it, e.g. (I'm making the numba part up):
@numba # Compiles function using LLVM
Travis Oliphant recently raised the issue on the NumPy list of what
mechanisms to use to box native functions produced by his Numba so that
SciPy functions can call it, e.g. (I'm making the numba part up):
@numba # Compiles function using LLVM
def f(x):
return 3 * x
print scipy.integrate.q
On 04/12/2012 11:00 PM, Wes McKinney wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 10:38 AM, mark florisson
wrote:
Yet another release candidate, this will hopefully be the last before
the 0.16 release. You can grab it from here:
http://wiki.cython.org/ReleaseNotes-0.16
There were several fixes for the nump
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 10:38 AM, mark florisson
wrote:
> Yet another release candidate, this will hopefully be the last before
> the 0.16 release. You can grab it from here:
> http://wiki.cython.org/ReleaseNotes-0.16
>
> There were several fixes for the numpy attribute rewrite, memoryviews
> and
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 11:21 AM, mark florisson
wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Could we run the pyregr test suite manually instead of automatically?
> It takes a lot of resources to build, and a single simple push to the
> cython-devel branch results in the build slots being hogged for hours,
> making the con
Hey,
Could we run the pyregr test suite manually instead of automatically?
It takes a lot of resources to build, and a single simple push to the
cython-devel branch results in the build slots being hogged for hours,
making the continuous development a lot less 'continuous'. We could
just decide to
Yet another release candidate, this will hopefully be the last before
the 0.16 release. You can grab it from here:
http://wiki.cython.org/ReleaseNotes-0.16
There were several fixes for the numpy attribute rewrite, memoryviews
and fused types. Accessing the 'base' attribute of a typed ndarray now
g
On 11 April 2012 18:04, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> mark florisson, 11.04.2012 17:19:
>> On 23 March 2012 19:48, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>>> Stefan Behnel, 23.03.2012 15:26:
mark florisson, 23.03.2012 14:26:
> Following tests excluded because of missing dependencies on your
> system:
>
13 matches
Mail list logo
