Robert Bradshaw, 22.03.2012 19:39:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> Regarding funding in general, maybe we should just start putting up one or
>> two of those sexy funding bars on our web site, like the PyPy devs do for
>> their funded projects. Assuming that goes well, i
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 1:03 PM, John Hunter wrote:
> That's my understanding. Getting US non-profit status is a lot of work to
> start with. I'm not familiar with what it will take for other countries but
> I will bring it up at the next meeting.
At PyCon, we had some brief conversations with
One more note about release numbering, ideally no 0.x.y release should
be in any way backwards incompatible.
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
>
> IMO, the ideal would be to release 0.16 now and 0.16.1 in a couple of weeks,
> but I respect that this depends on how much
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Stefan Behnel, 20.03.2012 18:51:
>> mark florisson, 20.03.2012 17:40:
>>> As for the two pull requests, both are quite large, but the dict
>>> iteration rewrite is more like an enhancement whereas the 'yield from'
>>> is really a new (somewh
mark florisson, 22.03.2012 19:50:
> For the fused type runtime dispatch I found it very convenient to use
> the with statement, but that is not supported in Python 2.4. However,
> the compiler could dynamically compile compiler code with the compiler
> itself and import it (pyximport), if it is not
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>
> Ok, just for clarification: the foundation is US based and not currently
> targeting any other countries, right?
>
That's my understanding. Getting US non-profit status is a lot of work to
start with. I'm not familiar with what it will
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> John Hunter, 22.03.2012 20:39:
>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
Well, I seem to remember from a talk that NumFOCUS will have a full-time
(or part-time?) position to deal with such administration. And they'll
John Hunter, 22.03.2012 20:39:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>>> Well, I seem to remember from a talk that NumFOCUS will have a full-time
>>> (or part-time?) position to deal with such administration. And they'll be
>>> set up as a non-profit (so tax-exempt for US-based do
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>
> > Well, I seem to remember from a talk that NumFOCUS will have a full-time
> > (or part-time?) position to deal with such administration. And they'll be
> > set up as a non-profit (so tax-exempt for US-based donations). So I think
> > that
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 22.03.2012 19:21:
>> On 03/22/2012 10:52 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>>> Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 22.03.2012 17:58:
On 03/22/2012 09:03 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> I would prefer copying the original installation over
Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 22.03.2012 20:12:
> On 03/22/2012 11:50 AM, mark florisson wrote:
>> For the fused type runtime dispatch I found it very convenient to use
>> the with statement, but that is not supported in Python 2.4. However,
>> the compiler could dynamically compile compiler code with the
On 03/22/2012 12:03 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 22.03.2012 19:21:
Slightly related: I believe the best thing we can do to attract more
developers is to seriously clean up the codebase. My new year's resolution
is that if I get some days for working on Cython this year (I hope
On 03/22/2012 11:39 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 22.03.2012 17:58:
On 03/22/2012 09:03 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
I would prefer copying the original installation over
(including the build history), rather than rebuildin
On 03/22/2012 11:50 AM, mark florisson wrote:
Hey,
For the fused type runtime dispatch I found it very convenient to use
the with statement, but that is not supported in Python 2.4. However,
the compiler could dynamically compile compiler code with the compiler
itself and import it (pyximport),
Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 22.03.2012 19:21:
> On 03/22/2012 10:52 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 22.03.2012 17:58:
>>> On 03/22/2012 09:03 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
I would prefer copying the original installation over
(including the build history), rather than rebuilding it
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> Thanks! I've restarted hudson/jenkins.
> https://sage.math.washington.edu:8091/hudson/
>
> Lets try to put all the configuration/persistant data into someone's
> home directory, and use /levi/scratch for the workspaces only.
>
> William, is
Hey,
For the fused type runtime dispatch I found it very convenient to use
the with statement, but that is not supported in Python 2.4. However,
the compiler could dynamically compile compiler code with the compiler
itself and import it (pyximport), if it is not needed to compile
Cython itself. I
Thanks! I've restarted hudson/jenkins.
https://sage.math.washington.edu:8091/hudson/
Lets try to put all the configuration/persistant data into someone's
home directory, and use /levi/scratch for the workspaces only.
William, is /levi/scratch the best place for file-IO intensive work? I
think it
William Stein, 22.03.2012 19:38:
> /levi is back on sage.math.
>
> If you use it, I encourage you to continue doing so. However, please
> setup a crontab'd rsync backup of
> anything important on there to your /home directory.
Thanks!
I'm on it.
Stefan
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 22.03.2012 17:58:
>> On 03/22/2012 09:03 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>>> I would prefer copying the original installation over
>>> (including the build history), rather than rebuilding it.
>>
>> I hope it doesn't come to t
Hi,
/levi is back on sage.math.
If you use it, I encourage you to continue doing so. However, please
setup a crontab'd rsync backup of
anything important on there to your /home directory.
-- William
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 2:11 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Rob
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
> On 03/22/2012 10:52 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>>
>> Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 22.03.2012 17:58:
>>>
>>> On 03/22/2012 09:03 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
I would prefer copying the original installation over
(including the build h
On 03/22/2012 05:40 AM, mark florisson wrote:
On 22 March 2012 07:18, Stefan Behnel wrote:
Robert Bradshaw, 21.03.2012 21:24:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 6:47 AM, mark florisson wrote:
On 20 March 2012 18:51, Stefan Behnel wrote:
mark florisson, 20.03.2012 17:40:
On 18 March 2012 11:58, Stefan
On 03/22/2012 10:52 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 22.03.2012 17:58:
On 03/22/2012 09:03 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
I would prefer copying the original installation over
(including the build history), rather than rebuilding it.
I hope it doesn't come to this, but if it does, I t
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> Thanks for the offer. One problem I see is that /levi/scratch (a local
> disk) has been dismounted (or reconfigured). To save ourselves random
> permissions issues, it's probably best to run this script/job as
> scoder (I've got sudo).
>
>
Stefan Behnel, 20.03.2012 18:51:
> mark florisson, 20.03.2012 17:40:
>> As for the two pull requests, both are quite large, but the dict
>> iteration rewrite is more like an enhancement whereas the 'yield from'
>> is really a new (somewhat big) feature. I would personally prefer to
>> merge only en
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> William Stein, 22.03.2012 14:11:
>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 9:04 AM, David Kirkby wrote:
>>> On 22 March 2012 12:33, William Stein wrote:
The usb device (for /levi) never appeared after I remotely rebooted
sage.math.
Physical
Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 22.03.2012 17:58:
> On 03/22/2012 09:03 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> I would prefer copying the original installation over
>> (including the build history), rather than rebuilding it.
>
> I hope it doesn't come to this, but if it does, I think we should really
> look hard at S
On 03/22/2012 09:03 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
William Stein, 22.03.2012 14:11:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 9:04 AM, David Kirkby wrote:
On 22 March 2012 12:33, William Stein wrote:
The usb device (for /levi) never appeared after I remotely rebooted sage.math.
Physical access is thus probably requir
Vitja Makarov, 22.03.2012 17:12:
> Does the disk show up when you run lsusb?
No.
> If it doesn't reboot may help. Anyway, can you send me dmesg output?
It's not in dmesg either. Maybe it just switched itself off after the power
failure?
Stefan
___
cyt
2012/3/22 Stefan Behnel :
> William Stein, 22.03.2012 14:11:
>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 9:04 AM, David Kirkby wrote:
>>> On 22 March 2012 12:33, William Stein wrote:
The usb device (for /levi) never appeared after I remotely rebooted
sage.math.
Physical access is thus probably requi
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> William Stein, 22.03.2012 14:11:
>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 9:04 AM, David Kirkby wrote:
>>> On 22 March 2012 12:33, William Stein wrote:
The usb device (for /levi) never appeared after I remotely rebooted
sage.math.
Physical
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 6:11 AM, William Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 9:04 AM, David Kirkby wrote:
>> On 22 March 2012 12:33, William Stein wrote:
>>> The usb device (for /levi) never appeared after I remotely rebooted
>>> sage.math.
>>> Physical access is thus probably required. I'v
William Stein, 22.03.2012 14:11:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 9:04 AM, David Kirkby wrote:
>> On 22 March 2012 12:33, William Stein wrote:
>>> The usb device (for /levi) never appeared after I remotely rebooted
>>> sage.math.
>>> Physical access is thus probably required. I've emailed some people wh
Thanks for the offer. One problem I see is that /levi/scratch (a local
disk) has been dismounted (or reconfigured). To save ourselves random
permissions issues, it's probably best to run this script/job as
scoder (I've got sudo).
I'll see what I can do to get it running, assuming the sage.math
iss
On 21 March 2012 20:24, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 6:47 AM, mark florisson
> wrote:
>> On 20 March 2012 18:51, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>>> mark florisson, 20.03.2012 17:40:
On 18 March 2012 11:58, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> I put up two new pull requests on github:
>
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 9:04 AM, David Kirkby wrote:
> On 22 March 2012 12:33, William Stein wrote:
>> The usb device (for /levi) never appeared after I remotely rebooted
>> sage.math.
>> Physical access is thus probably required. I've emailed some people who are
>> in
>> Seattle, and we'll se
On 21 March 2012 13:58, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it seems like the sage.math server is broken again, at least it's lacking
> mounts when I try to log in. I'll restart Jenkins as soon as it's back
> working.
>
> Stefan
> ___
> cython-devel mailing
On 22 March 2012 07:18, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Robert Bradshaw, 21.03.2012 21:24:
>> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 6:47 AM, mark florisson wrote:
>>> On 20 March 2012 18:51, Stefan Behnel wrote:
mark florisson, 20.03.2012 17:40:
> On 18 March 2012 11:58, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> I put up two
Robert Bradshaw, 21.03.2012 21:56:
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 10:44 PM, mark florisson wrote:
> 2.
>> - profile guided optimizations (using python's profilers and/or a
>> custom profiler that collects data such as types etc, which can be
>> used to specialize variables inside loops (or entire functi
Robert Bradshaw, 21.03.2012 21:24:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 6:47 AM, mark florisson wrote:
>> On 20 March 2012 18:51, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>>> mark florisson, 20.03.2012 17:40:
On 18 March 2012 11:58, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> I put up two new pull requests on github:
>
> Implementat
41 matches
Mail list logo
