On 5 February 2012 22:03, mark florisson wrote:
> On 2 February 2012 21:38, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
> wrote:
>> On 02/02/2012 10:16 PM, mark florisson wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2 February 2012 12:19, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
>>> wrote:
I just realized that
cdef int[:] a = None
ra
On 7 February 2012 17:58, Sturla Molden wrote:
> On 07.02.2012 18:22, Dimitri Tcaciuc wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure I understand you, maybe you could elaborate on that?
>
>
> OpenCL code is a text string that is compiled when the program runs. So it
> can be generated from run-time data. Think of it li
On 7 February 2012 18:01, mark florisson wrote:
> On 7 February 2012 17:22, Dimitri Tcaciuc wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 5:52 AM, Sturla Molden wrote:
>>> On 05.02.2012 23:39, Dimitri Tcaciuc wrote:
>>>
3. Does it make sense to make OpenCL more explicit?
>>>
>>>
>>> No, it takes the use
On 7 February 2012 17:22, Dimitri Tcaciuc wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 5:52 AM, Sturla Molden wrote:
>> On 05.02.2012 23:39, Dimitri Tcaciuc wrote:
>>
>>> 3. Does it make sense to make OpenCL more explicit?
>>
>>
>> No, it takes the usefuness of OpenCL away, which is that kernels are text
>> s
On 07.02.2012 18:22, Dimitri Tcaciuc wrote:
I'm not sure I understand you, maybe you could elaborate on that?
OpenCL code is a text string that is compiled when the program runs. So
it can be generated from run-time data. Think of it like dynamic HTML.
Again, not sure what you mean here. A
On 7 February 2012 13:52, Sturla Molden wrote:
> On 05.02.2012 23:39, Dimitri Tcaciuc wrote:
>
>> 3. Does it make sense to make OpenCL more explicit?
>
>
> No, it takes the usefuness of OpenCL away, which is that kernels are text
> strings and compiled at run-time.
>
I don't know why you think th
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 5:52 AM, Sturla Molden wrote:
> On 05.02.2012 23:39, Dimitri Tcaciuc wrote:
>
>> 3. Does it make sense to make OpenCL more explicit?
>
>
> No, it takes the usefuness of OpenCL away, which is that kernels are text
> strings and compiled at run-time.
I'm not sure I understand
On 05.02.2012 23:39, Dimitri Tcaciuc wrote:
3. Does it make sense to make OpenCL more explicit?
No, it takes the usefuness of OpenCL away, which is that kernels are
text strings and compiled at run-time.
Heuristics and
automatic switching between, say, CPU and GPU is great for eg. Sage
use