Re: [Cython] test failure for cython-devel in Py2.4

2011-10-12 Thread Vitja Makarov
2011/10/13 Stefan Behnel : > mark florisson, 12.10.2011 23:46: > > On 10 October 2011 16:17, Stefan Behnel wrote: >> >> Jenkins currently reports several failures, and this one seems to be >> due to your tempita changes: >> > > https://sage.math.washington.edu:8091/h

Re: [Cython] test failure for cython-devel in Py2.4

2011-10-12 Thread Stefan Behnel
Stefan Behnel, 13.10.2011 07:10: mark florisson, 12.10.2011 23:46: Is it me or are other builds broken as well? I pushed a fix for the tempita thing, but it seems the entire py3k build is broken: https://sage.math.washington.edu:8091/hudson/view/All/job/cython-devel-build/54/PYVERSION=py3k/con

Re: [Cython] test failure for cython-devel in Py2.4

2011-10-12 Thread Stefan Behnel
mark florisson, 12.10.2011 23:46: On 10 October 2011 16:17, Stefan Behnel wrote: Jenkins currently reports several failures, and this one seems to be due to your tempita changes: https://sage.math.washington.edu:8091/hudson/view/cython-devel/job/cython-devel-lxml-trunk/PYVERSION=py24/31/consol

Re: [Cython] PyCon-DE wrap-up by Kay Hayen

2011-10-12 Thread Stefan Behnel
Robert Bradshaw, 11.10.2011 08:11: Thanks for the update and link. Sounds like PyCon-DE went well. More than that - here's my take on it: http://blog.behnel.de/index.php?p=188 Stefan ___ cython-devel mailing list cython-devel@python.org http://mail.

Re: [Cython] cython.parallel tasks, single, master, critical, barriers

2011-10-12 Thread mark florisson
On 12 October 2011 10:08, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 1:36 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn > wrote: >> On 10/12/2011 09:55 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote: I'm less sure about single, since making it a function indicates one could use it in other contexts and the whole thin

Re: [Cython] cython.parallel tasks, single, master, critical, barriers

2011-10-12 Thread mark florisson
On 12 October 2011 09:36, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote: > On 10/12/2011 09:55 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote: >> >> On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 5:57 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn >>  wrote: >>> >>> On 10/09/2011 02:18 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote: On 10/09/2011 02:11 PM, mark florisson wrote: > >>

Re: [Cython] cython.parallel tasks, single, master, critical, barriers

2011-10-12 Thread mark florisson
On 12 October 2011 10:20, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 1:49 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn > wrote: >> On 10/12/2011 10:36 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote: >>> >>> On 10/12/2011 09:55 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote: On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 5:57 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrot

Re: [Cython] Utilities, cython.h, libcython

2011-10-12 Thread Stefan Behnel
mark florisson, 06.10.2011 11:45: On 6 October 2011 01:05, Robert Bradshaw wrote: I'm not sure what the overhead is, if any, in calling function pointers vs. actually linking things together at the C level (which is essentially the same idea, but perhaps addresses are resolved at library load ti

Re: [Cython] cython.parallel tasks, single, master, critical, barriers

2011-10-12 Thread Dag Sverre Seljebotn
On 10/12/2011 11:08 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote: On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 1:36 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn I wouldn't resist a builtin "channel" type in Cython (since we don't have full templating/generics, it would be the only way of sending typed data conveniently?). zeromq seems to be a nice leve

Re: [Cython] cython.parallel tasks, single, master, critical, barriers

2011-10-12 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 1:49 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote: > On 10/12/2011 10:36 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote: >> >> On 10/12/2011 09:55 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 5:57 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn >>> wrote: On 10/09/2011 02:18 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wr

Re: [Cython] cython.parallel tasks, single, master, critical, barriers

2011-10-12 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 1:36 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote: > On 10/12/2011 09:55 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote: >>> I'm less sure about single, since making it a function indicates one >>> could >>> use it in other contexts and the whole thing becomes too magic (since >>> it's >>> tied to the positi

Re: [Cython] cython.parallel tasks, single, master, critical, barriers

2011-10-12 Thread Dag Sverre Seljebotn
On 10/12/2011 10:36 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote: On 10/12/2011 09:55 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote: On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 5:57 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote: On 10/09/2011 02:18 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote: On 10/09/2011 02:11 PM, mark florisson wrote: with parallel.critical(): this sec

Re: [Cython] cython.parallel tasks, single, master, critical, barriers

2011-10-12 Thread Dag Sverre Seljebotn
On 10/12/2011 09:55 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote: On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 5:57 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote: On 10/09/2011 02:18 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote: On 10/09/2011 02:11 PM, mark florisson wrote: Hey, So far people have been enthusiastic about the cython.parallel features, I thin

Re: [Cython] cython.parallel tasks, single, master, critical, barriers

2011-10-12 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 1:12 AM, mark florisson wrote: > On 9 October 2011 22:27, mark florisson wrote: >> >> On 9 October 2011 21:48, Jon Olav Vik wrote: >> > On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 9:01 PM, mark florisson >> > wrote: >> >> On 9 October 2011 19:54, Jon Olav Vik wrote: >> >>> Personally, I thi

Re: [Cython] cython.parallel tasks, single, master, critical, barriers

2011-10-12 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 5:57 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote: > On 10/09/2011 02:18 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote: >> >> On 10/09/2011 02:11 PM, mark florisson wrote: >>> >>> Hey, >>> >>> So far people have been enthusiastic about the cython.parallel features, >>> I think we should introduce some n