On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Vitja Makarov wrote:
> 2011/9/23 Robert Bradshaw :
>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Vitja Makarov
>> wrote:
>>> 2011/9/22 Robert Bradshaw :
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 1:20 AM, wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>>
>> The war
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 2:54 AM, Brett Calcott wrote:
> Hi. I've just reverted to 0.14.1 because 0.15 breaks code that implements a
> cpp callback in python. It seems to be a name-mangling problem.
> I've attached a short test case that shows the problem. They both compile
> fine on 14.1 and 15. B
2011/9/23 Robert Bradshaw :
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Vitja Makarov
> wrote:
>> 2011/9/22 Robert Bradshaw :
>>> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 1:20 AM, wrote:
Hi Robert,
Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>
> The warning seem correct to me, or is foo actually modifying the
> va
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Vitja Makarov wrote:
> 2011/9/22 Robert Bradshaw :
>> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 1:20 AM, wrote:
>>> Hi Robert,
>>>
>>> Robert Bradshaw wrote:
The warning seem correct to me, or is foo actually modifying the
values of cya and cyb? (I suppose this coul
2011/9/22 Robert Bradshaw :
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 1:20 AM, wrote:
>> Hi Robert,
>>
>> Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>>>
>>> The warning seem correct to me, or is foo actually modifying the
>>> values of cya and cyb? (I suppose this could be possible by taking the
>>> address of the "passed by refere
