Re: [Cython] Cython 0.15.1 release candidate

2011-09-15 Thread Stefan Behnel
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis, 16.09.2011 05:24: 1 error ("compiling (cpp) and running tupleunpack_T712") and 0 failures with Python 3.1. 1 error ("compiling (cpp) and running tupleunpack_T712") and 4 failures with Python 3.2. ==

Re: [Cython] Cython 0.15.1 release candidate

2011-09-15 Thread Vitja Makarov
2011/9/16 Robert Bradshaw : > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Vitja Makarov > wrote: >> 2011/9/16 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis : >>> 1 test failure with Python 2.6: >>> >>> compiling (c) and running tupleunpack_T712 ... Doctest: >>> tupleunpack_T712.__test__.single_from_set (line 12) ...

Re: [Cython] Cython 0.15.1 release candidate

2011-09-15 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Vitja Makarov wrote: > 2011/9/16 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis : >> 1 test failure with Python 2.6: >> >> compiling (c) and running tupleunpack_T712 ... Doctest: >> tupleunpack_T712.__test__.single_from_set (line 12) ... ok >> Doctest: tupleunpack_T712.__tes

Re: [Cython] Cython 0.15.1 release candidate

2011-09-15 Thread Vitja Makarov
2011/9/16 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis : > 1 test failure with Python 2.6: > > compiling (c) and running tupleunpack_T712 ... Doctest: > tupleunpack_T712.__test__.single_from_set (line 12) ... ok > Doctest: tupleunpack_T712.__test__.single_from_string (line 4) ... ok > compiling (cpp) and r

Re: [Cython] Cython 0.15.1 release candidate

2011-09-15 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
1 error ("compiling (cpp) and running tupleunpack_T712") and 0 failures with Python 3.1. 1 error ("compiling (cpp) and running tupleunpack_T712") and 4 failures with Python 3.2. The end of output of tests with Python 3.2: == ER

Re: [Cython] Cython 0.15.1 release candidate

2011-09-15 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
1 test failure with Python 2.6: compiling (c) and running tupleunpack_T712 ... Doctest: tupleunpack_T712.__test__.single_from_set (line 12) ... ok Doctest: tupleunpack_T712.__test__.single_from_string (line 4) ... ok compiling (cpp) and running tupleunpack_T712 ... cc1plus: warning: command line

Re: [Cython] Bugfix release

2011-09-15 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote: > Robert Bradshaw, 15.09.2011 22:31: >> >> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote: >>> >>> Yaroslav Halchenko, 15.09.2011 17:08: On Tue, 13 Sep 2011, Robert Bradshaw wrote: >> >> I guess we're set for a release t

Re: [Cython] Bugfix release

2011-09-15 Thread Stefan Behnel
Robert Bradshaw, 15.09.2011 22:31: On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote: Yaroslav Halchenko, 15.09.2011 17:08: On Tue, 13 Sep 2011, Robert Bradshaw wrote: I guess we're set for a release then, right? +1. Should we send a release candidate around, or just cut it (as it is b

[Cython] Cython 0.15.1 release candidate

2011-09-15 Thread Robert Bradshaw
See http://wiki.cython.org/ReleaseNotes-0.15.1 This is a bugfix only release, we hope to get it out shortly. - Robert ___ cython-devel mailing list cython-devel@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel

Re: [Cython] Bugfix release

2011-09-15 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote: > Yaroslav Halchenko, 15.09.2011 17:08: >> >> On Tue, 13 Sep 2011, Robert Bradshaw wrote: I guess we're set for a release then, right? >> >>> +1. Should we send a release candidate around, or just cut it (as it >>> is bugfix-only and

Re: [Cython] Bugfix release

2011-09-15 Thread Stefan Behnel
Yaroslav Halchenko, 15.09.2011 17:08: On Tue, 13 Sep 2011, Robert Bradshaw wrote: I guess we're set for a release then, right? +1. Should we send a release candidate around, or just cut it (as it is bugfix-only and hasn't been too long since the last one)? Also, is there a parameterized je

Re: [Cython] Bugfix release

2011-09-15 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
just to make sure -- 0.15.1 would come out from 'release' branch, right? (there is motion to get fresh cython into debian and I am arguing that it would be better to take post 0.15 snapshot) On Tue, 13 Sep 2011, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > > I guess we're set for a release then, right? > +1. Should