On 08/18/2011 09:27 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 11:39 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
On 08/17/2011 09:21 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
On 08/17/2011 08:19 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
That's a nice idea.
Sounds really interesting to me. Thanks for your proposal :) I may
have to dig the internals, so, first I'll study the Compiler code.
--SKS
___
cython-devel mailing list
cython-devel@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 10:32 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Stefano, 11.08.2011 16:24:
>>
>> now that I've nailed Cython code, I'd like to get into something more
>> funny.
>> Currently, I'm working on a set of macros to seamlessy integrate Cython
>> into
>> CMake build process (in fact, I love CMake
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 11:39 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
> wrote:
>> On 08/17/2011 09:21 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
>>> wrote:
On 08/17/2011 08:19 PM, Robert Bradsha
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 11:39 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
> On 08/17/2011 09:21 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 08/17/2011 08:19 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
That's a nice idea. I have to admit that all thes
On 08/18/2011 09:06 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 18.08.2011 08:39:
The semantics are simple: For all cdef functions, if "nogil" could have
been applied without a syntax error, then it gets automatically applied.
The only time this isn't completely safe is when the GIL is inten
Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 18.08.2011 08:39:
The semantics are simple: For all cdef functions, if "nogil" could have
been applied without a syntax error, then it gets automatically applied.
The only time this isn't completely safe is when the GIL is intentionally
being used as a lock.
In which case
