On 08/18/2011 08:39 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
On 08/17/2011 09:21 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
On 08/17/2011 08:19 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
That's a nice idea. I have to admit that all these special gil
declarations are a bi
Robert Bradshaw, 17.08.2011 20:19:
I have to admit that all these special gil
declarations are a bit messy. I'd also rather introduce clear
decorators, e.g.
@cython.requires_gil # expects gil
cdef a(): ...
@cython.requires.gil(False) # nogil
cdef b(): ...
@cython.aquires_gil # with gil
cdef
On 08/17/2011 09:21 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
On 08/17/2011 08:19 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
That's a nice idea. I have to admit that all these special gil
declarations are a bit messy. I'd also rather introduce clear
decorators,
Stefano, 11.08.2011 16:24:
now that I've nailed Cython code, I'd like to get into something more funny.
Currently, I'm working on a set of macros to seamlessy integrate Cython into
CMake build process (in fact, I love CMake). But, I'd like to work also on
something more essential, so...
Here's
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
> On 08/17/2011 08:19 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>>
>> That's a nice idea. I have to admit that all these special gil
>> declarations are a bit messy. I'd also rather introduce clear
>> decorators, e.g.
>>
>> @cython.requires_gil # exp
On 08/17/2011 08:19 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
That's a nice idea. I have to admit that all these special gil
declarations are a bit messy. I'd also rather introduce clear
decorators, e.g.
@cython.requires_gil # expects gil
cdef a(): ...
@cython.requires.gil(False) # nogil
cdef b(): ...
@cyth
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 1:08 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
> On 08/17/2011 09:12 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>> So your proposal is that "with cython.synchronized" has the same
>> effect as a Python operation, in that its a compile time error to do
>> it while not holding the gil? (As opposed to
On 08/17/2011 09:12 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 6:13 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
On 08/12/2011 02:45 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
[second try in moving this discussion to cython-devel]
Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 12.08.2011 08:50:
On 08/12/2011 06:44 AM, Robert Bradshaw wro
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 6:13 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
> On 08/12/2011 02:45 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> [second try in moving this discussion to cython-devel]
>>
>> Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 12.08.2011 08:50:
>>> On 08/12/2011 06:44 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 5:53 A
