Re: [Cython] Vitja's CyFunction branch

2011-08-12 Thread Vitja Makarov
2011/8/13 Stefan Behnel : > Vitja Makarov, 13.08.2011 06:41: >> >> 2011/7/30 Stefan Behnel: >>> >>> Robert Bradshaw, 30.07.2011 18:49: The only reason I haven't pushed a release branch is that last time I did that it kept getting the mainline development pulled into it >>> >>> T

Re: [Cython] Vitja's CyFunction branch

2011-08-12 Thread Stefan Behnel
Vitja Makarov, 13.08.2011 06:41: 2011/7/30 Stefan Behnel: Robert Bradshaw, 30.07.2011 18:49: The only reason I haven't pushed a release branch is that last time I did that it kept getting the mainline development pulled into it That was just an accident on my side when I wasn't aware of the

Re: [Cython] Vitja's CyFunction branch

2011-08-12 Thread Vitja Makarov
2011/7/30 Stefan Behnel : > Robert Bradshaw, 30.07.2011 18:49: >> >> The only reason I haven't pushed a release branch is that last >> time I did that it kept getting the mainline development pulled into >> it > > That was just an accident on my side when I wasn't aware of the new branch > you had

Re: [Cython] [cython-users] Calling gil-requiring function not allowed without gil

2011-08-12 Thread Dag Sverre Seljebotn
On 08/12/2011 02:45 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote: > [second try in moving this discussion to cython-devel] > > Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 12.08.2011 08:50: >> On 08/12/2011 06:44 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote: >>> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 5:53 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn >>> wrote: Are you still against this

Re: [Cython] [cython-users] Calling gil-requiring function not allowed without gil

2011-08-12 Thread Stefan Behnel
[second try in moving this discussion to cython-devel] Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 12.08.2011 08:50: On 08/12/2011 06:44 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote: On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 5:53 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote: On 08/11/2011 02:13 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote: Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 11.08.2011 13:58: O

Re: [Cython] Yet another Python to C compiler

2011-08-12 Thread Stefan Behnel
Vitja Makarov, 12.08.2011 08:49: Recently I've found one more Python to C compiler, that translates python bytecode into C source. And author says about 100% Python compatibility. That's clearly incorrect. From the code, it appears that at least the builtins are static, which means that it's *

Re: [Cython] Yet another Python to C compiler

2011-08-12 Thread Vitja Makarov
2011/8/12 Vitja Makarov : > Hi! > > Recently I've found one more Python to C compiler, that translates > python bytecode into C source. > And author says about 100% Python compatibility. The project is a > signle 800KB python file. > > http://code.google.com/p/2c-python/ > > I was wondering when fo