Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 02.08.2011 08:28:
On 08/02/2011 07:44 AM, Vitja Makarov wrote:
Maybe it's better to use "git archive"?
If it's only about creating a tarball, then 'git tag' (or, I assume, a
commit hash) will suffice -- GitHub automatically tarballs for you:
https://github.com/cython/cyt
On 08/02/2011 07:44 AM, Vitja Makarov wrote:
2011/8/2 Robert Bradshaw:
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
wrote:
2011-07-31 09:45:15 Robert Bradshaw napisał(a):
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
Cython has seen an enormous amount of d
Robert Bradshaw, 02.08.2011 02:42:
In general, if we have a distinct release branch (e.g if anything
really interesting had gone in since the last rc), I'd say we should
push release fixes to that and then merge into master.
+1
Stefan
___
cython-deve
2011/8/2 Robert Bradshaw :
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
> wrote:
>> 2011-07-31 09:45:15 Robert Bradshaw napisał(a):
>>> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Robert Bradshaw
>>> wrote:
>>> > Cython has seen an enormous amount of development since 0.14.1. If you
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 11:48 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> mark florisson, 31.07.2011 22:08:
>>
>> I pushed it to release, should I rebase master on release now?
>
> Well, so far, the release branch hasn't been used and rc1 was created from
> master. All current changes in master are either consider
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
wrote:
> 2011-07-31 09:45:15 Robert Bradshaw napisał(a):
>> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Robert Bradshaw
>> wrote:
>> > Cython has seen an enormous amount of development since 0.14.1. If you
>> > are not already using the lat
2011-07-31 09:45:15 Robert Bradshaw napisał(a):
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Robert Bradshaw
> wrote:
> > Cython has seen an enormous amount of development since 0.14.1. If you
> > are not already using the latest version from the development
> > repository, we encourage you to try out the r
On 1 August 2011 08:48, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> mark florisson, 31.07.2011 22:08:
>>
>> I pushed it to release, should I rebase master on release now?
>
> Well, so far, the release branch hasn't been used and rc1 was created from
> master. All current changes in master are either considered safe (b
