2011/7/22 Stefan Behnel :
> Vitja Makarov, 21.07.2011 20:57:
>>
>> 2011/7/21 Stefan Behnel:
>>>
>>> Robert Bradshaw, 21.07.2011 11:21:
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Vitja Makarov wrote:
>
> 2011/7/8 mark florisson
>>
>> In descr_get you create and return a new CyFunction
Pauli Virtanen, 07.07.2011 21:06:
On Thu, 07 Jul 2011 20:10:30 +0200, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
[clip]
5 minutes of Googling didn't turn up anything... Do you think it would
be a bad idea to simply delete these branches, something like
git push origin :refs/*
That drops *all* branches -- no
Vitja Makarov, 21.07.2011 20:57:
2011/7/21 Stefan Behnel:
Robert Bradshaw, 21.07.2011 11:21:
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Vitja Makarov wrote:
2011/7/8 mark florisson
In descr_get you create and return a new CyFunction with a __self__
set (note, not m_self) and in __call__ you put __sel
Robert Bradshaw, 22.07.2011 01:00:
Are the lxml failures at
https://sage.math.washington.edu:8091/hudson/job/cython-devel-lxml-trunk-py27/
expected?
Yes, the "test_xmlschema_import_file" test keeps crashing with a high
probability. Some kind of threading related bug, no idea how to reproduce
On 21 July 2011 23:43, Christoph Gohlke wrote:
>
>
> On 7/21/2011 4:14 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>>
>> Cython has seen an enormous amount of development since 0.14.1. If you
>> are not already using the latest version from the development
>> repository, we encourage you to try out the release can
On 7/21/2011 4:14 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
Cython has seen an enormous amount of development since 0.14.1. If you
are not already using the latest version from the development
repository, we encourage you to try out the release candidate:
http://cython.org/release/Cython-0.15rc0.tar.gz
- Rob
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 4:24 PM, 최원준 wrote:
> what is the new feature of cython 0.15?
The release notes are still pretty bare-bones, but see:
http://wiki.cython.org/ReleaseNotes-0.15
> 2011/7/22 Robert Bradshaw
>>
>> Cython has seen an enormous amount of development since 0.14.1. If you
>> are
Cython has seen an enormous amount of development since 0.14.1. If you
are not already using the latest version from the development
repository, we encourage you to try out the release candidate:
http://cython.org/release/Cython-0.15rc0.tar.gz
- Robert
_
Stefan,
Are the lxml failures at
https://sage.math.washington.edu:8091/hudson/job/cython-devel-lxml-trunk-py27/
expected?
- Robert
___
cython-devel mailing list
cython-devel@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel
2011/7/21 Stefan Behnel :
> Robert Bradshaw, 21.07.2011 11:21:
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Vitja Makarov wrote:
>>>
>>> 2011/7/8 mark florisson
In descr_get you create and return a new CyFunction with a __self__
set (note, not m_self) and in __call__ you put __self__ in the
Robert Bradshaw, 21.07.2011 11:21:
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Vitja Makarov wrote:
2011/7/8 mark florisson
In descr_get you create and return a new CyFunction with a __self__
set (note, not m_self) and in __call__ you put __self__ in the args
tuple and the function as m_self, and then call
Lars Buitinck, 21.07.2011 11:28:
2011/7/21 Robert Bradshaw:
https://github.com/cython/cython/commit/55d5e576935d83c6bdadc593e36793aecffe0bae
I'm not familiar enough with the Cython internals to understand this
change; are #includes now generated in the C code in the order of the
corresponding
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 2:28 AM, Lars Buitinck wrote:
> 2011/7/21 Robert Bradshaw :
>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Robert Bradshaw
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 9:40 PM, Vitja Makarov
>>> wrote:
2011/7/21 Robert Bradshaw :
> I'm not sure what we can do here--we make sure
2011/7/21 Robert Bradshaw :
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Robert Bradshaw
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 9:40 PM, Vitja Makarov
>> wrote:
>>> 2011/7/21 Robert Bradshaw :
I'm not sure what we can do here--we make sure to emit the #include
statements in the same order as they
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Vitja Makarov wrote:
>
>
> 2011/7/8 mark florisson
>>
>> On 7 July 2011 22:39, Vitja Makarov wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > 2011/7/8 mark florisson
>> >>
>> >> On 7 July 2011 22:15, Vitja Makarov wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > 2011/7/7 mark florisson
>> >> >>
>> >> >> O
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 4:24 AM, mark florisson
wrote:
> I added a test for nested parallelism with exceptions (with OpenMP
> nesting explicitly enabled), however if libgomp cannot create more
> threads it exits the process with exit status 1 and the message
> "libgomp: Thread creation failed: Res
2011/7/21 Robert Bradshaw :
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Robert Bradshaw
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 9:40 PM, Vitja Makarov
>> wrote:
>>> 2011/7/21 Robert Bradshaw :
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Vitja Makarov
wrote:
> 2011/7/16 Lars Buitinck :
>> 2011/7/15
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 9:40 PM, Vitja Makarov
> wrote:
>> 2011/7/21 Robert Bradshaw :
>>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Vitja Makarov
>>> wrote:
2011/7/16 Lars Buitinck :
> 2011/7/15 Vitja Makarov :
>> I've found stran
18 matches
Mail list logo