On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 9:40 PM, Vitja Makarov wrote:
> 2011/7/21 Robert Bradshaw :
>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Vitja Makarov
>> wrote:
>>> 2011/7/16 Lars Buitinck :
2011/7/15 Vitja Makarov :
> I've found strange bug. In my example cimport misses "fcntl.h" include:
>
> (
2011/7/21 Robert Bradshaw :
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Vitja Makarov
> wrote:
>> 2011/7/16 Lars Buitinck :
>>> 2011/7/15 Vitja Makarov :
I've found strange bug. In my example cimport misses "fcntl.h" include:
((c2f2e12...)) vitja@vitja-laptop:~/work/cython-vitek/zzz$ cat ./
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Vitja Makarov wrote:
> 2011/7/16 Lars Buitinck :
>> 2011/7/15 Vitja Makarov :
>>> I've found strange bug. In my example cimport misses "fcntl.h" include:
>>>
>>> ((c2f2e12...)) vitja@vitja-laptop:~/work/cython-vitek/zzz$ cat ./fff.pyx
>>> cimport posix.unistd
>>> c
2011/7/16 Lars Buitinck :
> 2011/7/15 Vitja Makarov :
>> I've found strange bug. In my example cimport misses "fcntl.h" include:
>>
>> ((c2f2e12...)) vitja@vitja-laptop:~/work/cython-vitek/zzz$ cat ./fff.pyx
>> cimport posix.unistd
>> cimport posix.fcntl
>>
>> print posix.fcntl.O_RDWR
>
> Fascinati
On 20 July 2011 23:41, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think we're getting way off course with this discussion. The following is
> a good way to get back into a useful direction.
>
> Robert Bradshaw, 20.07.2011 23:24:
>>
>> it would be a runtime error when trying to import the
>> objects. I suppo
Hi,
I think we're getting way off course with this discussion. The following is
a good way to get back into a useful direction.
Robert Bradshaw, 20.07.2011 23:24:
it would be a runtime error when trying to import the
objects. I suppose if cimport does not inject anything into the python
names
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 2:47 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> mark florisson, 20.07.2011 11:40:
>>
>> On 20 July 2011 11:26, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>>>
>>> mark florisson, 20.07.2011 10:51:
On 20 July 2011 02:32, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>
> We're long overdue for a release, and this week
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 2:53 PM, mark florisson
wrote:
> On 20 July 2011 23:24, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 12:53 PM, mark florisson
>> wrote:
>>> On 20 July 2011 21:44, Lisandro Dalcin wrote:
On 20 July 2011 16:27, mark florisson wrote:
> On 20 July 2011 21:13,
On 20 July 2011 23:24, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 12:53 PM, mark florisson
> wrote:
>> On 20 July 2011 21:44, Lisandro Dalcin wrote:
>>> On 20 July 2011 16:27, mark florisson wrote:
On 20 July 2011 21:13, Lisandro Dalcin wrote:
> On 20 July 2011 15:32, mark flori
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 12:53 PM, mark florisson
wrote:
> On 20 July 2011 21:44, Lisandro Dalcin wrote:
>> On 20 July 2011 16:27, mark florisson wrote:
>>> On 20 July 2011 21:13, Lisandro Dalcin wrote:
On 20 July 2011 15:32, mark florisson wrote:
> On 20 July 2011 20:04, Lisandro Dalc
On 20 July 2011 21:44, Lisandro Dalcin wrote:
> On 20 July 2011 16:27, mark florisson wrote:
>> On 20 July 2011 21:13, Lisandro Dalcin wrote:
>>> On 20 July 2011 15:32, mark florisson wrote:
On 20 July 2011 20:04, Lisandro Dalcin wrote:
> On 20 July 2011 13:51, mark florisson wrote:
On 20 July 2011 16:27, mark florisson wrote:
> On 20 July 2011 21:13, Lisandro Dalcin wrote:
>> On 20 July 2011 15:32, mark florisson wrote:
>>> On 20 July 2011 20:04, Lisandro Dalcin wrote:
On 20 July 2011 13:51, mark florisson wrote:
> On 20 July 2011 18:06, Lisandro Dalcin wrote:
On 20 July 2011 21:13, Lisandro Dalcin wrote:
> On 20 July 2011 15:32, mark florisson wrote:
>> On 20 July 2011 20:04, Lisandro Dalcin wrote:
>>> On 20 July 2011 13:51, mark florisson wrote:
On 20 July 2011 18:06, Lisandro Dalcin wrote:
> On 19 July 2011 20:48, Robert Bradshaw
>
On 20 July 2011 15:32, mark florisson wrote:
> On 20 July 2011 20:04, Lisandro Dalcin wrote:
>> On 20 July 2011 13:51, mark florisson wrote:
>>> On 20 July 2011 18:06, Lisandro Dalcin wrote:
On 19 July 2011 20:48, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Lisandr
On 20 July 2011 20:04, Lisandro Dalcin wrote:
> On 20 July 2011 13:51, mark florisson wrote:
>> On 20 July 2011 18:06, Lisandro Dalcin wrote:
>>> On 19 July 2011 20:48, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Lisandro Dalcin wrote:
> On 19 July 2011 02:24, Vitja Makaro
On 20 July 2011 13:51, mark florisson wrote:
> On 20 July 2011 18:06, Lisandro Dalcin wrote:
>> On 19 July 2011 20:48, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Lisandro Dalcin wrote:
On 19 July 2011 02:24, Vitja Makarov wrote:
> 2011/7/18 Robert Bradshaw :
>> Tr
On 20 July 2011 18:06, Lisandro Dalcin wrote:
> On 19 July 2011 20:48, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Lisandro Dalcin wrote:
>>> On 19 July 2011 02:24, Vitja Makarov wrote:
2011/7/18 Robert Bradshaw :
> Trevor King and I discussed this quite a while back, bu
On 19 July 2011 20:48, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Lisandro Dalcin wrote:
>> On 19 July 2011 02:24, Vitja Makarov wrote:
>>> 2011/7/18 Robert Bradshaw :
Trevor King and I discussed this quite a while back, but every time I
got around to looking at his code
2011/7/20 mark florisson :
> On 20 July 2011 11:47, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> mark florisson, 20.07.2011 11:40:
>>>
>>> On 20 July 2011 11:26, Stefan Behnel wrote:
mark florisson, 20.07.2011 10:51:
>
> On 20 July 2011 02:32, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>>
>> We're long overdue f
On 20 July 2011 11:47, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> mark florisson, 20.07.2011 11:40:
>>
>> On 20 July 2011 11:26, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>>>
>>> mark florisson, 20.07.2011 10:51:
On 20 July 2011 02:32, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>
> We're long overdue for a release, and this week would be a
mark florisson, 20.07.2011 11:40:
On 20 July 2011 11:26, Stefan Behnel wrote:
mark florisson, 20.07.2011 10:51:
On 20 July 2011 02:32, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
We're long overdue for a release, and this week would be a good one
for me to push one out. Hudson
https://sage.math.washington.edu:80
On 20 July 2011 11:26, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> mark florisson, 20.07.2011 10:51:
>>
>> On 20 July 2011 02:32, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>>>
>>> We're long overdue for a release, and this week would be a good one
>>> for me to push one out. Hudson
>>> https://sage.math.washington.edu:8091/hudson is loo
mark florisson, 20.07.2011 10:51:
On 20 July 2011 02:32, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
We're long overdue for a release, and this week would be a good one
for me to push one out. Hudson
https://sage.math.washington.edu:8091/hudson is looking in pretty good
shape, and though I know we've got a big pile
On 20 July 2011 02:32, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> We're long overdue for a release, and this week would be a good one
> for me to push one out. Hudson
> https://sage.math.washington.edu:8091/hudson is looking in pretty good
> shape, and though I know we've got a big pile of stuff currently in
> prog
24 matches
Mail list logo