Re: [Cython] Control Flow

2011-05-29 Thread Vitja Makarov
2011/5/29 Stefan Behnel : > Vitja Makarov, 29.05.2011 11:17: >> >> 2011/5/29 Stefan Behnel: >>> >>> Vitja Makarov, 29.05.2011 10:11: I've started new branch called control_flow_fixes. >>> >>> I think you can safely apply the subsequent fixes to the master branch, >>> now >>> that the feat

Re: [Cython] Control Flow

2011-05-29 Thread Stefan Behnel
Vitja Makarov, 29.05.2011 11:17: 2011/5/29 Stefan Behnel: Vitja Makarov, 29.05.2011 10:11: I've started new branch called control_flow_fixes. I think you can safely apply the subsequent fixes to the master branch, now that the feature is in. That will also give you broader feedback from Jenki

Re: [Cython] Control Flow

2011-05-29 Thread Vitja Makarov
2011/5/29 Stefan Behnel : > Vitja Makarov, 29.05.2011 10:11: >> >> 2011/5/28 Stefan Behnel: >>> >>> Stefan Behnel, 28.05.2011 18:06: Let's see how much of Sage we break. >>> >>> ... quite a bit. From a superficial glance, there seem to be some real >>> bugs, > > Bugs in Sage, to be clear.

Re: [Cython] Control Flow

2011-05-29 Thread Stefan Behnel
Vitja Makarov, 29.05.2011 10:11: 2011/5/28 Stefan Behnel: Stefan Behnel, 28.05.2011 18:06: Let's see how much of Sage we break. ... quite a bit. From a superficial glance, there seem to be some real bugs, Bugs in Sage, to be clear. but most of the failures and warnings are most likely j

Re: [Cython] Control Flow

2011-05-29 Thread Vitja Makarov
2011/5/28 Stefan Behnel : > Stefan Behnel, 28.05.2011 18:06: >> >> Let's see how much of Sage we break. > > ... quite a bit. From a superficial glance, there seem to be some real bugs, > but most of the failures and warnings are most likely just uninitialised > variables that are expected to be Non