Stefan Behnel, 28.05.2011 18:06:
Let's see how much of Sage we break.
... quite a bit. From a superficial glance, there seem to be some real
bugs, but most of the failures and warnings are most likely just
uninitialised variables that are expected to be None.
https://sage.math.washington.ed
Robert Bradshaw, 28.05.2011 18:14:
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 1:15 AM, Vitja Makarov wrote:
So maybe I should add functions like __Pyx_RaiseUnboundLocalError and
__Pyx_RaiseClosureNameError that will use 3) way.
How do you like put_error_if_unbound CCodeWriter method is that right
place for it?
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 2:37 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Robert Bradshaw, 28.05.2011 00:39:
>>
>> On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>>>
>>> I recently stumbled over a tradeoff question with AttributeError, and now
>>> found the same situation for UnboundLocalError in Vitja's con
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 1:15 AM, Vitja Makarov wrote:
> 2011/5/28 Robert Bradshaw :
>> On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I recently stumbled over a tradeoff question with AttributeError, and now
>>> found the same situation for UnboundLocalError in Vitja's cont
Vitja,
here are some more quirks, but they are minor issues. I'll commit my
changes to lxml to keep it working, and then merge in the branch. It's
certainly in a "good enough for a merge" state.
I'm actually surprised how few problems I had to fix, given how old the
code in lxml is by now. L
Vitja Makarov, 28.05.2011 16:58:
-Wextra enables "maybe uninitialized" warning and unused entry.
Interesting:
cdef int _raise_if_stored(self) except -1:
if self._exc_info is None:
return 0
type, value, traceback = self._exc_info
self._exc_info = None
Vitja Makarov, 28.05.2011 16:58:
2011/5/28 Stefan Behnel:
Vitja Makarov, 28.05.2011 14:12:
2011/5/28 Stefan Behnel:
Ok, I think we're done then, right? Anything else to do before merging it
back?
I hope so ;)
I gave your branch a test with lxml and it spit out a couple of missing
initial
2011/5/28 Stefan Behnel :
> Vitja Makarov, 28.05.2011 14:12:
>>
>> 2011/5/28 Stefan Behnel:
>>>
>>> Ok, I think we're done then, right? Anything else to do before merging it
>>> back?
>>
>> I hope so ;)
>
> I gave your branch a test with lxml and it spit out a couple of missing
> initialisation war
Vitja Makarov, 28.05.2011 14:12:
2011/5/28 Stefan Behnel:
Ok, I think we're done then, right? Anything else to do before merging it
back?
I hope so ;)
I gave your branch a test with lxml and it spit out a couple of missing
initialisation warnings. Most of them were due to the usage of C out
2011/5/28 Stefan Behnel :
> Vitja Makarov, 28.05.2011 13:48:
>>
>> 2011/5/28 Stefan Behnel:
>>>
>>> Vitja Makarov, 28.05.2011 11:48:
2011/5/28 Robert Bradshaw:
>
> On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 7:27 AM, Vitja Makarov wrote:
>>
>> I've recently fixed some issues:
>>
>> -
Vitja Makarov, 28.05.2011 13:48:
2011/5/28 Stefan Behnel:
Vitja Makarov, 28.05.2011 11:48:
2011/5/28 Robert Bradshaw:
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 7:27 AM, Vitja Makarov wrote:
I've recently fixed some issues:
- closure variables were not tracked
- scoped expression variables were initiali
2011/5/28 Stefan Behnel :
> Vitja Makarov, 28.05.2011 11:48:
>>
>> 2011/5/28 Robert Bradshaw:
>>>
>>> On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 7:27 AM, Vitja Makarov wrote:
I've recently fixed some issues:
- closure variables were not tracked
- scoped expression variables were initialized
Vitja Makarov, 28.05.2011 11:48:
2011/5/28 Robert Bradshaw:
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 7:27 AM, Vitja Makarov wrote:
I've recently fixed some issues:
- closure variables were not tracked
- scoped expression variables were initialized to None
So, I should fix broken tests, here are some of th
2011/5/28 Robert Bradshaw :
> On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 7:27 AM, Vitja Makarov
> wrote:
>> I've recently fixed some issues:
>>
>> - closure variables were not tracked
>> - scoped expression variables were initialized to None
>>
>> So, I should fix broken tests, here are some of them:
>>
>> nogil
Robert Bradshaw, 28.05.2011 00:39:
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
I recently stumbled over a tradeoff question with AttributeError, and now
found the same situation for UnboundLocalError in Vitja's control flow
branch. So here it is.
When we raise an exception several tim
2011/5/28 Robert Bradshaw :
> On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I recently stumbled over a tradeoff question with AttributeError, and now
>> found the same situation for UnboundLocalError in Vitja's control flow
>> branch. So here it is.
>>
>> When we raise an exce
16 matches
Mail list logo
