2011/4/25 Vitja Makarov :
> 2011/4/25 Stefan Behnel :
>> Vitja Makarov, 25.04.2011 11:04:
>>>
>>> 2011/4/25 Stefan Behnel:
Vitja Makarov, 25.04.2011 08:19:
>
> 2011/4/25 Stefan Behnel:
>>
>> Stefan Behnel, 07.04.2011 13:52:
>>>
>>> Stefan Behnel, 07.04.2011 13:46:
Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
The argument to the above goes that you *should* be out of luck. For
instance, talking about dot products, BLAS itself has float-float and
double-double, but not float-double AFAIK.
Seems to me that's more because generating lots of versions
of a function in C is h
2011/5/4 Stefan Behnel :
> Vitja Makarov, 04.05.2011 21:14:
>>
>> 2011/5/4 Stefan Behnel:
>>>
>>> Vitja Makarov, 04.05.2011 07:09:
Jenkins doesn't work for me. It seems that it can't do pull and is
running tests again obsolete sources.
May be because of forced push.
Th
On 4 May 2011 21:13, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
> On 05/04/2011 08:07 PM, mark florisson wrote:
>>
>> On 4 May 2011 19:44, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 05/04/2011 07:03 PM, mark florisson wrote:
On 4 May 2011 18:35, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
>
> Moving pull
Vitja Makarov, 04.05.2011 21:14:
2011/5/4 Stefan Behnel:
Vitja Makarov, 04.05.2011 07:09:
Jenkins doesn't work for me. It seems that it can't do pull and is
running tests again obsolete sources.
May be because of forced push.
There are only 6 errors here:
https://sage.math.washington.edu:809
On 05/04/2011 08:13 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 1:47 AM, mark florisson
wrote:
On 4 May 2011 10:24, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
On 05/04/2011 01:07 AM, Greg Ewing wrote:
mark florisson wrote:
cdef func(floating x, floating y):
...
you get a "float, float" version,
2011/5/4 Stefan Behnel :
> Vitja Makarov, 04.05.2011 07:09:
>>
>> Jenkins doesn't work for me. It seems that it can't do pull and is
>> running tests again obsolete sources.
>> May be because of forced push.
>>
>> There are only 6 errors here:
>>
>> https://sage.math.washington.edu:8091/hudson/view
On 05/04/2011 08:07 PM, mark florisson wrote:
On 4 May 2011 19:44, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
On 05/04/2011 07:03 PM, mark florisson wrote:
On 4 May 2011 18:35, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
Moving pull requestion discussion
(https://github.com/cython/cython/pull/28)
over here:
First, I g
Vitja Makarov, 04.05.2011 07:09:
Jenkins doesn't work for me. It seems that it can't do pull and is
running tests again obsolete sources.
May be because of forced push.
There are only 6 errors here:
https://sage.math.washington.edu:8091/hudson/view/cython-vitek/job/cython-vitek-tests-py27-c/
A
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 22:43 +0400, Vitja Makarov wrote:
> Thanks! Am I right: when you do reset '--hard origin/master' you are
> on the master branch and when you do checkout you are in a 'detached
> state'?
Yes, I think that you are right, that's why we used to do reset instead:
$ git fetch ori
2011/5/4 Yury V. Zaytsev :
> On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 10:35 +0400, Vitja Makarov wrote:
>> > Can you please provide me jenkins account and I'll try to fix the issues
>> > myself?
>> >
>>
>> It's better to use:
>>
>> $ git fetch origin
>> $ git checkout -f origin/master
>>
>> Instead of git pull
>
> O
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 10:35 +0400, Vitja Makarov wrote:
> > Can you please provide me jenkins account and I'll try to fix the issues
> > myself?
> >
>
> It's better to use:
>
> $ git fetch origin
> $ git checkout -f origin/master
>
> Instead of git pull
Or
$ git fetch origin
$ git reset --ha
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 1:47 AM, mark florisson
wrote:
> On 4 May 2011 10:24, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
>> On 05/04/2011 01:07 AM, Greg Ewing wrote:
>>>
>>> mark florisson wrote:
>>>
cdef func(floating x, floating y):
...
you get a "float, float" version, and a "double, doubl
On 4 May 2011 19:44, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
> On 05/04/2011 07:03 PM, mark florisson wrote:
>>
>> On 4 May 2011 18:35, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Moving pull requestion discussion
>>> (https://github.com/cython/cython/pull/28)
>>> over here:
>>>
>>> First, I got curious why you'd
On 05/04/2011 07:03 PM, mark florisson wrote:
On 4 May 2011 18:35, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
Moving pull requestion discussion (https://github.com/cython/cython/pull/28)
over here:
First, I got curious why you'd have a strip off "-pthread" from CC. I'd
think you could just execute with it wi
On 4 May 2011 18:35, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
> Moving pull requestion discussion (https://github.com/cython/cython/pull/28)
> over here:
>
> First, I got curious why you'd have a strip off "-pthread" from CC. I'd
> think you could just execute with it with "-pthread", which seems simpler.
It
Moving pull requestion discussion
(https://github.com/cython/cython/pull/28) over here:
First, I got curious why you'd have a strip off "-pthread" from CC. I'd
think you could just execute with it with "-pthread", which seems simpler.
Second: If parallel.parallel is not callable, how are sche
On 4 May 2011 14:23, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
> On 05/04/2011 02:17 PM, mark florisson wrote:
>>
>> On 4 May 2011 14:10, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 05/04/2011 01:59 PM, mark florisson wrote:
On 4 May 2011 13:54, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
>
> On 05/04/20
On 05/04/2011 02:17 PM, mark florisson wrote:
On 4 May 2011 14:10, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
On 05/04/2011 01:59 PM, mark florisson wrote:
On 4 May 2011 13:54, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
On 05/04/2011 01:48 PM, mark florisson wrote:
On 4 May 2011 13:47, mark florisson wrote:
O
On 4 May 2011 14:17, mark florisson wrote:
> On 4 May 2011 14:10, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
>> On 05/04/2011 01:59 PM, mark florisson wrote:
>>>
>>> On 4 May 2011 13:54, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
>>> wrote:
On 05/04/2011 01:48 PM, mark florisson wrote:
>
> On 4 May 2011 13:47, mar
On 4 May 2011 14:10, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
> On 05/04/2011 01:59 PM, mark florisson wrote:
>>
>> On 4 May 2011 13:54, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 05/04/2011 01:48 PM, mark florisson wrote:
On 4 May 2011 13:47, mark florisson wrote:
>
> On 4 May 2011 13:45,
On 05/04/2011 01:59 PM, mark florisson wrote:
On 4 May 2011 13:54, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
On 05/04/2011 01:48 PM, mark florisson wrote:
On 4 May 2011 13:47, mark florissonwrote:
On 4 May 2011 13:45, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
Look.
i = 42
for i in prange(n):
f(i)
print i
On 4 May 2011 13:54, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
> On 05/04/2011 01:48 PM, mark florisson wrote:
>>
>> On 4 May 2011 13:47, mark florisson wrote:
>>>
>>> On 4 May 2011 13:45, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
>>> wrote:
>
Look.
i = 42
for i in prange(n):
f(i)
print i # want 4
On 05/04/2011 01:48 PM, mark florisson wrote:
On 4 May 2011 13:47, mark florisson wrote:
On 4 May 2011 13:45, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
Look.
i = 42
for i in prange(n):
f(i)
print i # want 42 whenever n == 0
Now, translate this to:
i = 42;
#pragma omp parallel for firstprivate(i) l
On 4 May 2011 13:47, mark florisson wrote:
> On 4 May 2011 13:45, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
>> On 05/04/2011 01:41 PM, mark florisson wrote:
>>>
>>> On 4 May 2011 13:39, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
>>> wrote:
On 05/04/2011 01:30 PM, mark florisson wrote:
>
> On 4 May 2011 13:15, Dag
On 4 May 2011 13:45, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
> On 05/04/2011 01:41 PM, mark florisson wrote:
>>
>> On 4 May 2011 13:39, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 05/04/2011 01:30 PM, mark florisson wrote:
On 4 May 2011 13:15, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
>
> On 05/04/20
On 05/04/2011 01:41 PM, mark florisson wrote:
On 4 May 2011 13:39, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
On 05/04/2011 01:30 PM, mark florisson wrote:
On 4 May 2011 13:15, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
On 05/04/2011 12:59 PM, mark florisson wrote:
On 4 May 2011 12:45, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
On 4 May 2011 13:39, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
> On 05/04/2011 01:30 PM, mark florisson wrote:
>>
>> On 4 May 2011 13:15, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 05/04/2011 12:59 PM, mark florisson wrote:
On 4 May 2011 12:45, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
>
> On 05/04/20
On 05/04/2011 01:30 PM, mark florisson wrote:
On 4 May 2011 13:15, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
On 05/04/2011 12:59 PM, mark florisson wrote:
On 4 May 2011 12:45, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
On 05/04/2011 12:00 PM, mark florisson wrote:
There are two remaining issue. The first is warning
On 4 May 2011 13:15, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
> On 05/04/2011 12:59 PM, mark florisson wrote:
>>
>> On 4 May 2011 12:45, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 05/04/2011 12:00 PM, mark florisson wrote:
There are two remaining issue. The first is warnings for potentially
unin
On 05/04/2011 12:59 PM, mark florisson wrote:
On 4 May 2011 12:45, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
On 05/04/2011 12:00 PM, mark florisson wrote:
There are two remaining issue. The first is warnings for potentially
uninitialized variables for prange(). When you do
for i in prange(start, stop, step
On 4 May 2011 12:45, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
> On 05/04/2011 12:00 PM, mark florisson wrote:
>>
>> On 21 April 2011 20:13, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 04/21/2011 10:37 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 7:51 AM, mark florisson
wrote:
>
On 05/04/2011 12:00 PM, mark florisson wrote:
On 21 April 2011 20:13, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
On 04/21/2011 10:37 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 7:51 AM, mark florisson
wrote:
On 18 April 2011 16:41, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
Excellent! Sounds great! (as I
On 21 April 2011 20:13, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
> On 04/21/2011 10:37 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 7:51 AM, mark florisson
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 18 April 2011 16:41, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
>>> wrote:
Excellent! Sounds great! (as I won't have my laptop for
On 4 May 2011 10:24, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
> On 05/04/2011 01:07 AM, Greg Ewing wrote:
>>
>> mark florisson wrote:
>>
>>> cdef func(floating x, floating y):
>>> ...
>>>
>>> you get a "float, float" version, and a "double, double" version, but
>>> not "float, double" or "double, float".
>>
>>
On 05/04/2011 01:07 AM, Greg Ewing wrote:
mark florisson wrote:
cdef func(floating x, floating y):
...
you get a "float, float" version, and a "double, double" version, but
not "float, double" or "double, float".
It's hard to draw conclusions from this example because
it's degenerate. You do
On 4 May 2011 01:07, Greg Ewing wrote:
> mark florisson wrote:
>
>> cdef func(floating x, floating y):
>> ...
>>
>> you get a "float, float" version, and a "double, double" version, but
>> not "float, double" or "double, float".
>
> It's hard to draw conclusions from this example because
> it's
37 matches
Mail list logo
