On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 10:09:42AM +1300, Greg Ewing wrote:
> W. Trevor King wrote:
> > Hmm, that means that
> >
> > cimport numpy
> > a = numpy.numpy.ndarray
> >
> > also compiles.
>
> Compiles and runs, or just compiles?
You're right. Cython compilation worked, but it didn't run:
W. Trevor King wrote:
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 04:41:27PM -0800, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 3:31 PM, W. Trevor King wrote:
cython $ grep class Cython/Includes/numpy.pxd
ctypedef class numpy.dtype [object PyArray_Descr]:
ctypedef extern class numpy.flatiter [o
Greg Ewing, 20.02.2011 21:13:
Robert Bradshaw wrote:
BTW, the "public" keyword is the wrong thing to use here, as that
actually controls name mangling and (c-level) symbol exporting. The
fact that means a different thing for members than for top-level
symbols isn't ideal, but at least it's unam
Robert Bradshaw wrote:
BTW, the "public" keyword is the wrong thing to use here, as that
actually controls name mangling and (c-level) symbol exporting. The
fact that means a different thing for members than for top-level
symbols isn't ideal, but at least it's unambiguous as members need not
be
2011/2/16 Vitja Makarov :
> 2011/2/15 Stefan Behnel :
>> Robert Bradshaw, 15.02.2011 08:21:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 9:49 PM, Vitja Makarov wrote:
2011/2/15 Robert Bradshaw:
>
> On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 11:40 PM, Vitja Makarov wrote:
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> In order
W. Trevor King, 20.02.2011 03:32:
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 04:41:27PM -0800, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 3:31 PM, W. Trevor King wrote:
I think it's better to keep cdef meaning "backed by C data", not
necessarily "written using C syntax", since you're trying to do more
with Cy
W. Trevor King, 20.02.2011 00:31:
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 02:04:16PM -0800, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 1:45 PM, W. Trevor King wrote:
It is unclear to me what `cdef public struct` means. I think it
should mean "Python bindings can alter this struct's definition",
which does
Stefan Behnel, 18.02.2011 05:50:
I still didn't get a response from Gmane, but this article doesn't look
promising:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.discuss/13987
So I guess we'll have to request a new group. Very unfortunate.
They've updated the group subscription. Turns out that changing Gman
