nformation."
I hope this satisfies the requirements.
regards
Teun Burgers
Charles Wilson wrote:
> Looks good to me -- with these caveats:
>
> 1) /etc/postinstall/gnugo.sh is not included in your "binary" tarball.
> 2) /usr/doc/Cygwin/gnugo-3.2.README is not included in your "binary"
> tarball.
> 3) In the source tarball, the file "CYGWIN-PATCHES/setup.hints" should
Modem Protocol (GMP)."
I hope I got it right!
regards
Teun Burgers
couldn't agree more. Putting them under XFree86 strongly suggests that
the package would be part of XFree86, and that is not the case.
Teun Burgers
balls were prepared with generic-build-script.sh.
Here is the setup.hint:
category: Devel
requires:
sdesc:"the GNU Scientific Library"
ldesc:"the GNU Scientific Library, a collection of numerical
routines for scientific computing."
regards
Teun Burgers
Charles Wilson wrote:
> Well, I said *packaging* looks okay. However, I object to the setup.hint:
>
> category: Devel
> requires:
> sdesc:"the GNU Scientific Library"
> ldesc:"the GNU Scientific Library, a collection of numerical
> routines for scientific computing."
>
> This is not a
l/qn/prive/ar.burgers/gsl-1.3-1-src.tar.bz2
http://home.quicknet.nl/qn/prive/ar.burgers/gsl-1.3-1.tar.bz2
The tarballs were prepared with generic-build-script.sh.
regards,
Teun Burgers
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> Where was the announcement for this package? Are we falling behind
> in announcing new/updated packages?
yes, I've been away with Christmas, so I didn't notice right away it had
been uploaded.
Dockeen wrote:
> I noted in running setup today that GSL-1.3 was there.
>
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> But isn't this the second release?
Yes
> I don't see any record of an
> announcement in cygwin-announce.
That is correct and that is sloppiness on my part and not in accordance
with the high level of quality of cygwin.
I took and take on responsibility for this packa
nl/qn/prive/ar.burgers/gnugo-3.4-1.tar.bz2
http://home.quicknet.nl/qn/prive/ar.burgers/gnugo-3.4-1-src.tar.bz2
The tarballs were prepared with generic-build-script.sh.
No patch was required. The executable has been packed with upx.
Teun Burgers
Krzysztof Dulêba wrote:
> OK, but what's new in this release? I haven't found any NEWS file in the
> package.
Indeed there isn't one in the binary distribution, though there is a
NEWS file in the source tarball.
I propose the following patch to generic-build-script.sh such that
the NEWS file is
Hello,
I've uploaded binary and source packages of version 1.4 of the
GSL (GNU Scientific Library), release at 14-08-2003.
The homepage for the GSL is http://www.fsf.org/software/gsl/
These are the URL's of binary and source tarballs:
http://home.quicknet.nl/qn/prive/ar.burgers/gsl-1.4-1-src.ta
lls:
http://home.quicknet.nl/qn/prive/ar.burgers/cgoban-1.9.14-1.tar.bz2
http://home.quicknet.nl/qn/prive/ar.burgers/cgoban-1.9.14-1-src.tar.bz2
The tarballs were prepared with generic-build-script.sh and compiled
with 1.5.3.
Teun Burgers
Nicholas Wourms wrote:
IIRC, OOTB fltk is heavily dependant on mingw/w32api stuff,
Obviously since it is a cross-platform toolkit. The cygwin version with
a win32 GUI relies on the w32api ,
but not on mingw.
doesn't target Cygwin/XFree86
This binary package doesnt, though an XFree86 version cou
I've uploaded a new version of fltk-1.1.4 source- and binary packages.
http://home.quicknet.nl/qn/prive/ar.burgers/fltk-1.1.4-1.tar.bz2
http://home.quicknet.nl/qn/prive/ar.burgers/fltk-1.1.4-1-src.tar.bz2
A good review was made by Nicholas in:
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-10/msg002
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Ok, here we go, I used these Makefiles to build dynamic libraries linked
against X. You may also integrate the changes into the usual
Makefile templates, but I used these handcrafted files. I used them
with fltk-1.1.4rc1, so there may be some additional problems with the
Daniel Reed wrote:
Looks like there may be a problem in the binary file, tar -jtvvf is yelling
at me:
Fixed now. Something must have gone wrong during upload
Teun
To the libtool and automake maintainer,
At the fsf mirrors the current versions of libtool
and automake are 1.5.2 and 1.8.3 respectively.
cygwin setup distributes 1.5 and 1.7.9. Though these versions
are not badly outdated, I suggest to upload newer versions.
Regards,
Teun Burgers
.html
The tarballs were prepared with the current generic-build-script.sh
from the cygwin web site.
Please upload
regards,
Teun Burgers
.html
The tarballs were prepared with the current generic-build-script.sh
from the cygwin web site.
Please upload
regards,
Teun Burgers
James R. Phillips wrote:
Trial Cygwin packages are now available for octave-2.1.71. These packages are
dependent on the lapack-3.0 package now awaiting upload.
Looks good. A very nice contribution to the cygwin packages.
octave starts and seems to work, though I can't judge
that very well sin
James R. Phillips wrote:
Files available:
octave-forge-2005.05.06-1.tar.bz2
tar -C / -xjf octave-forge-2005.05.06-1.tar.bz2
This works as advertised. Since the files are
extracted to a directory included in octave's DEFAULT_LOADPATH,
the functions are available after start-up of octave. se
James R. Phillips wrote:
Though the package has already been uploaded, I have a few remarks:
octave-forge-2005.05.06-1.tar.bz2
- The functions in main/gsl are not included. Did you have
the gsl package installed during configuring? The configure script
detects gsl correctly.
octave-forg
To the libxml2 maintainer:
See also
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2005-05/msg00888.html
The libxml2-devel packages contains an import library (libxml2.dll.a),
but no static archive (libxml2.a). Most other packages do, e.g.
libpng12-devel. What is the reason for this?
I would like to sugges
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to package and maintain orpie for Cygwin. orpie is a
fullscreen RPN calculator for the console. Its operation is similar to
that of modern HP calculators, but data entry has been optimized for
efficiency on a PC keyboard. Features include extensive scient
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Uploaded.
Thank you.
Can I remove one of 1.5-1 or 1.6.1?
Please remove 1.5-1 and keep 1.6-1.
Done. It would help to just send a link to the new setup.hint file
as well.
Ok, I will keep that in mind for future releases.
Teun
Jari Aalto wrote:
gsl-1.4-2.tar.bz2:/usr/bin/cyggsl-0.dll
Are you using an up-to-date version of gsl? gsl-1.5-1, gsl-1.6-1 and
gsl-1.6-2 have been released since 1.4-2.
Teun
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
please reply to this mail within the next six weeks,
including a list of ALL packages you maintain.
gsl
gnugo
cgoban
fltk
Teun
1.7 see:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gsl/2005-09/msg0.html
Please upload this new version. I suggest to keep 1.6-1 (that
version did not depend upon lapack) as previous and remove 1.6-2.
regards,
Teun Burgers
Christopher Faylor wrote:
Please reorganize your download directory with subdirectories containing
packages and setup.hint's and then provide shell commands using 'cd' and
'wget' for retrieving the packages.
Attached you find a script gsl-get.sh that fetches the files and
organises them in wha
Reini Urban wrote:
ImageMagick is missing two dll's which where deleted in the latest
xorg-x11-bin-dlls update.
required for ImageMagick at least:
usr/X11R6/bin/cygdps-1.dll
usr/X11R6/bin/cygdpstk-1.dll
The reasons for the withdrawal of these two libraries are explained here:
http://www
LS,
I've uploaded a - long overdue - new version of fltk
(Fast Light Toolkit).
The most important changes are:
- upgrade to the most recent version,
- switch to cygport building framework,
- split into separate runtime, devel, doc and demos packages.
http://home.quicknet.nl/qn/prive/ar.burgers/
l-doc/setup.hint
Please remove gsl-1.7-1 and leave gsl-1.8-2 as previous
kind regards
Teun Burgers
l-doc/setup.hint
Please remove gsl-1.8-2 and leave gsl-1.9-1 as previous
kind regards
Teun Burgers
34 matches
Mail list logo
