Am 31.03.2020 um 18:19 schrieb ASSI:
Marco Atzeri via Cygwin-apps writes:
It will also make a hypothetical future upgrade hard.
Is 2.0.0-1 major of 2.0.0-b9-1 ?
Upstream would probably say yes, but they might chose to release a 2.0.1
instead.
The problem is how setup logic will judge.
In
Marco Atzeri via Cygwin-apps writes:
> It will also make a hypothetical future upgrade hard.
>
> Is 2.0.0-1 major of 2.0.0-b9-1 ?
Upstream would probably say yes, but they might chose to release a 2.0.1
instead.
> PS: I wonder if having a test version 4 years old that is clearly not
> moving at
Dear Andrew
I think the Version-Release of your test package is confusing,
as we have two dashes instead of only one.
It will also make a hypothetical future upgrade hard.
Is 2.0.0-1 major of 2.0.0-b9-1 ?
Regards
Marco
PS: I wonder if having a test version 4 years old that is clearly not
mov
