On 2014-07-22 11:12, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
There are a few issues with the current man-db setup:
1) the cache is not strictly necessary for operation of man(1);
2) mandb -c is quite slow with a large number of manpages (~20min on my
system)
3) generating the cache only during man-db postinst
On Aug 3 22:36, waterlan wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen schreef op 2014-07-30 17:52:
> >Chris, ping?
>
> It is summer vacation time...
True.
> >On Jul 22 11:12, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> >>Chris,
> >>
> >>There are a few issues with the current man-db setup:
> >>
> >>1) the cache is not strictly ne
Corinna Vinschen schreef op 2014-07-30 17:52:
Chris, ping?
It is summer vacation time...
On Jul 22 11:12, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
Chris,
There are a few issues with the current man-db setup:
1) the cache is not strictly necessary for operation of man(1);
2) mandb -c is quite slow with a
Chris, ping?
On Jul 22 11:12, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> Chris,
>
> There are a few issues with the current man-db setup:
>
> 1) the cache is not strictly necessary for operation of man(1);
>
> 2) mandb -c is quite slow with a large number of manpages (~20min on my
> system)
>
> 3) generating t
Chris,
There are a few issues with the current man-db setup:
1) the cache is not strictly necessary for operation of man(1);
2) mandb -c is quite slow with a large number of manpages (~20min on my
system)
3) generating the cache only during man-db postinstall doesn't help for
manpages updated o
