Re: doxygen details

2002-12-02 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 06:52:10PM +0100, Pavel Tsekov wrote: >On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> Correct me if I'm wrong but was that two packages with the same name >> uploaded to sources.redhat.com? I don't think that's correct, if so. >> We shouldn't be offering the same packag

Re: doxygen details

2002-12-02 Thread Pavel Tsekov
On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, Christopher Faylor wrote: > Correct me if I'm wrong but was that two packages with the same name > uploaded to sources.redhat.com? I don't think that's correct, if so. > We shouldn't be offering the same package with different contents to > users even if the changes to the pac

Re: doxygen details

2002-12-02 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 09:58:29AM +0100, Pavel Tsekov wrote: >On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, Ryunosuke Satoh wrote: > >> I update doxygen-package. > >Uploaded. Correct me if I'm wrong but was that two packages with the same name uploaded to sources.redhat.com? I don't think that's correct, if so. We should

Re: doxygen details

2002-12-02 Thread Pavel Tsekov
On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, Ryunosuke Satoh wrote: > I update doxygen-package. Uploaded.

Re: doxygen details

2002-12-01 Thread Ryunosuke Satoh
nts. Please upload. Ryunosuke Satoh [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: "Pavel Tsekov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ryunosuke Satoh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2002 8:44 PM Subject: Re: doxygen deta

Re: doxygen details

2002-12-01 Thread Pavel Tsekov
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Ryunosuke Satoh wrote: > Yes, I am. Thanks, Joshua. I will add build reuirements. I've uploaded doxygen to sources.redhat.com. I've used the tarballs found in your yahoo briefcase i.e. the ones without the updated build instructions. Send an announcement to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: doxygen details

2002-11-27 Thread Ryunosuke Satoh
Yes, I am. Thanks, Joshua. I will add build reuirements. Ryu - Original Message - From: "Pavel Tsekov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ryunosuke Satoh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 6:23 PM Subject: Re:

Re: doxygen details

2002-11-27 Thread Pavel Tsekov
Ryo, are you still willing to maintain the doxygen package for Cygwin ? > On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 07:29:50PM -0800, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: > >Here is a response to Chris' request for a show of confidence in doxygen: > > > >http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-10/msg00156.html > > > >It

Re: doxygen details

2002-11-26 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 07:29:50PM -0800, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: >Here is a response to Chris' request for a show of confidence in doxygen: > >http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-10/msg00156.html > >It looks like a useful tool. Some major projects are using it, like >libstdc++ (for gc

doxygen details

2002-11-26 Thread Joshua Daniel Franklin
Here is a response to Chris' request for a show of confidence in doxygen: http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-10/msg00156.html It looks like a useful tool. Some major projects are using it, like libstdc++ (for gcc), rpm, and abiword. It can produce nice source documentation in html and in