On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 05:06:42PM +0300, Jari Aalto wrote:
>Christopher Faylor writes:
>
>> Can I get a show of hands? How many package maintainers would like to
>> have a bug tracker?
>
>There is only one good, easy to use, user/maintainer friendly bug
>tracker I know of:
>
>debbugs [1]
Yo
Christopher Faylor writes:
> Can I get a show of hands? How many package maintainers would like to
> have a bug tracker?
There is only one good, easy to use, user/maintainer friendly bug
tracker I know of:
debbugs [1]
The best thing about it is that it is very lightweight and controllable
On 20/08/2010 19:01, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> Can I get a show of hands? How many package maintainers would like to
> have a bug tracker?
I would definitely use it, the same way I currently use the GCC bug tracker:
I'd set up a whine email reminder, so that I didn't have to exert any extra
e
On Fri, 2010-08-20 at 13:51 -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> OTOH, I do sometimes miss things on the main list due to the
> signal-to-noise ratio, which I imaging would be even greater for a
> maintainer with only a small number of packages. So using Bugzilla
> "internally" would be helpful.
>
>
On Fri, 2010-08-20 at 14:01 -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> Can I get a show of hands? How many package maintainers would like to
> have a bug tracker?
Depends on how we use it.
Don't get me wrong -- I like working with Bugzilla, and we do use it
*internally* for Cygwin/X, but the list is sti
On Aug 20 14:31, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 11:22:46AM -0700, David Rothenberger wrote:
> >On 8/20/2010 11:01 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >>Can I get a show of hands? How many package maintainers would like to
> >>have a bug tracker?
> >
> >-0 (Not in favor, but I'll m
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 02:24:31PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 08:11:31PM +0200, Reini Urban wrote:
>>2010/8/20 Christopher Faylor :
>>> Can I get a show of hands? ?How many package maintainers would like to
>>> have a bug tracker?
>>
>>1+
>>
>>Yes, it's a lot more wor
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 11:22:46AM -0700, David Rothenberger wrote:
>On 8/20/2010 11:01 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>Can I get a show of hands? How many package maintainers would like to
>>have a bug tracker?
>
>-0 (Not in favor, but I'll monitor it if it's implemented.)
>
>We're still going to
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 08:11:31PM +0200, Reini Urban wrote:
>2010/8/20 Christopher Faylor :
>> Can I get a show of hands? ?How many package maintainers would like to
>> have a bug tracker?
>
>1+
>
>Yes, it's a lot more work for all parties, the server maintainer,
>the package maintainer and the us
On 8/20/2010 11:01 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> Can I get a show of hands? How many package maintainers would like to
> have a bug tracker?
-0 (Not in favor, but I'll monitor it if it's implemented.)
We're still going to have to monitor the mailing list, so this just adds
burden AFAICT. Does
2010/8/20 Christopher Faylor :
> Can I get a show of hands? How many package maintainers would like to
> have a bug tracker?
1+
Yes, it's a lot more work for all parties, the server maintainer,
the package maintainer and the user. And I believe it will suffer
from the same problems as the almost
Can I get a show of hands? How many package maintainers would like to
have a bug tracker?
One problem that I see immediately is that if we publicly adopt a bug
tracker EVERY maintainer will have to use it. We can't expect a normal
user to understand that they send email to the mailing list for b
12 matches
Mail list logo
