On Thu, 2020-06-04 at 01:20 +0900, Yasuhiro KIMURA wrote:
> From: Yasuhiro KIMURA
> > So I gave up to use override.hint and decided to change version number
> > to "9100h+0.4". It works fine with all of cygport, mksetupini and
> > setup-x86_64.
>
> Anyway version number issue has sloved. So I wou
From: Yasuhiro KIMURA
Subject: Re: Update of packages by non-maintainer
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2020 14:31:56 +0900 (JST)
> So I gave up to use override.hint and decided to change version number
> to "9100h+0.4". It works fine with all of cygport, mksetupini and
> setup-x86_64.
An
From: Achim Gratz
Subject: Re: Update of packages by non-maintainer
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 11:59:01 +0200
>> In my case following line should be put as override.hint. Right?
>>
> --
Am 29.05.2020 um 00:34 schrieb Yasuhiro KIMURA:
In my case following line should be put as override.hint. Right?
--
curr: 0.4-1
--
You would probably also nee
Thank for reply, and sorry for late response
I had some troubles to upgrade anthy port to version 0.4 from Debian.
But I managed to success to build new anthy packages and am now
testing them with my daily use.
From: Marco Atzeri
Subject: Re: Update of packages by non-maintainer
Date: Thu, 21
