Re: Unmaintained packages in base package set

2024-01-25 Thread Marco Atzeri via Cygwin-apps
On 03/01/2024 08:49, Marco Atzeri wrote: +librsvg2 Marco Atzeri just discovered that librsvg2 requires Rust by long time ** The librsvg 2.40.x series is the last "C only" version of the library; it was deprecated in 2017.** https://viruta.org/do-not-use-li

Re: Unmaintained packages in base package set

2024-01-07 Thread ASSI via Cygwin-apps
Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps writes: > I found the cause. DISTCLEANFILES in original cygport file removes them. > Now I can successfully build libatk1.0-doc. Thanks! No, that means the tarball includes files that should get re-built, but apparently you somehow failed to do that. Regards, Achim.

Re: Unmaintained packages in base package set

2024-01-07 Thread Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps
On Sun, 7 Jan 2024 22:35:02 +0900 Takashi Yano via wrote: > In the source file, docs/xml directory should have document contents, > however, it is empty. So, I thought document cannot be built in this > version. I'll check again. I found the cause. DISTCLEANFILES in original cygport file removes t

Re: Unmaintained packages in base package set

2024-01-07 Thread Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps
On Sun, 7 Jan 2024 12:54:35 + Jon Turney wrote: > > ERROR: package 'atk1.0-src' version '2.38.0-1' build-depends: > > 'girepository(GLib-2.0)', but nothing satisfies that > > ERROR: package 'atk1.0-src' version '2.38.0-1' build-depends: > > 'pkgconfig(glib-2.0)', but nothing satisfies that >

Re: Unmaintained packages in base package set

2024-01-07 Thread Jon Turney via Cygwin-apps
On 03/01/2024 07:49, Marco Atzeri via Cygwin-apps wrote: On 03/01/2024 05:59, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote: On Sat, 23 Dec 2023 04:51:22 +0100 Marco Atzeri wrote: On 23/12/2023 04:42, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote: I suggest to start with the smaller beasts one by one or small gro

Re: Unmaintained packages in base package set

2024-01-03 Thread 1dakotaxi via Cygwin-apps
StopSent from my T-Mobile 5G Device Original message From: Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps Date: 1/2/24 9:00 PM (GMT-08:00) To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Unmaintained packages in base package set On Sat, 23 Dec 2023 04:51:22 +0100Marco Atzeri wrote:> On 23/12/2023

Re: Unmaintained packages in base package set

2024-01-02 Thread Marco Atzeri via Cygwin-apps
On 03/01/2024 05:59, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote: On Sat, 23 Dec 2023 04:51:22 +0100 Marco Atzeri wrote: On 23/12/2023 04:42, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote: I suggest to start with the smaller beasts one by one or small groups I suspect GTK3 needs a lot of effort Thanks for the

Re: Unmaintained packages in base package set

2024-01-02 Thread Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps
On Sat, 23 Dec 2023 04:51:22 +0100 Marco Atzeri wrote: > On 23/12/2023 04:42, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote: > > On Wed, 20 Dec 2023 12:16:05 + > > Jon Turney via Cygwin-apps wrote: > >> I tweaked the unmaintained packages report [1] a bit so it identifies > >> 'base' and 'direct or indir

Re: Unmaintained packages in base package set

2023-12-22 Thread Marco Atzeri via Cygwin-apps
On 23/12/2023 04:42, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote: On Wed, 20 Dec 2023 12:16:05 + Jon Turney via Cygwin-apps wrote: I tweaked the unmaintained packages report [1] a bit so it identifies 'base' and 'direct or indirect base dependencies'. (But you're quite right to point out that the b

Re: Unmaintained packages in base package set

2023-12-22 Thread Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps
On Wed, 20 Dec 2023 12:16:05 + Jon Turney via Cygwin-apps wrote: > I tweaked the unmaintained packages report [1] a bit so it identifies > 'base' and 'direct or indirect base dependencies'. > > (But you're quite right to point out that the build requirements for a > native Cygwin build are

Re: Unmaintained packages in base package set

2023-12-22 Thread Jon Turney via Cygwin-apps
On 21/12/2023 04:27, Marco Atzeri via Cygwin-apps wrote: On 20/12/2023 13:16, Jon Turney via Cygwin-apps wrote: On 06/12/2023 17:19, Brian Inglis via Cygwin-apps wrote: On 2023-12-05 06:07, Jon Turney wrote: [...] I tweaked the unmaintained packages report [1] a bit so it identifies 'base

Re: Unmaintained packages in base package set

2023-12-21 Thread Mark Geisert via Cygwin-apps
Marco Atzeri via Cygwin-apps wrote: Is anyone looking at QT5 and QT6 ? I've "looked at" Qt5 in the past, though not to the point of being able to take it over. I have a patch for the qterminal issue that I'd like to contribute. There's issues I've had building this I haven't had the time to

Re: Unmaintained packages in base package set

2023-12-20 Thread Marco Atzeri via Cygwin-apps
On 20/12/2023 13:16, Jon Turney via Cygwin-apps wrote: On 06/12/2023 17:19, Brian Inglis via Cygwin-apps wrote: On 2023-12-05 06:07, Jon Turney wrote: [...] I tweaked the unmaintained packages report [1] a bit so it identifies 'base' and 'direct or indirect base dependencies'. (But you'r

Unmaintained packages in base package set

2023-12-20 Thread Jon Turney via Cygwin-apps
On 06/12/2023 17:19, Brian Inglis via Cygwin-apps wrote: On 2023-12-05 06:07, Jon Turney wrote: [...] I was kind of hoping that base packages (and "dependencies of packages in base which aren't in base themselves") aren't unmaintained, but obviously that was being optimistic... I though