--- Yaakov S wrote:
> Gentoo[1] uses an interesting technique to build both single- and
> double-precision libraries (the single-precision libs have an additional
> 'f' in their name) from the same package.
>
> This could be adapted for our purposes (yes, I've actually done it):
>
> In the conf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Since the package is in SuSE and Debian, just go ahead and prepare the
> package. But I'm wondering why it's useful to drop the single precision
> calls. Sounds like an unnecessary restriction to me.
Gentoo[1] uses an inte
--- "Gerrit P. Haase" wrote:
> Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>
> > Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >
> >> Since the package is in SuSE and Debian, just go ahead and prepare the
> >> package. But I'm wondering why it's useful to drop the single precision
> >> calls. Sounds like an unnecessary restriction
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 11 17:55, James R. Phillips wrote:
Comments welcomed.
Since the package is in SuSE and Debian, just go ahead and prepare the
package. But I'm wondering why it's useful to drop the single precision
calls. Sounds like an unnecessary res
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 11 17:55, James R. Phillips wrote:
Although fftw3 can be built with both single and double precision versions,
octave only uses double precision, so that is all I propose to build. Only a
shared library (dll) will be built; no static library will be provided. I
On Aug 11 17:55, James R. Phillips wrote:
> Although fftw3 can be built with both single and double precision versions,
> octave only uses double precision, so that is all I propose to build. Only a
> shared library (dll) will be built; no static library will be provided. I
> have
> verified tha
