Re: ITP: checkx-0.1.0-1

On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 08:54:33PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: > checkx does not yet have a home for ongoing development, save my hard > drive, so there's no "upstream" site, and obviously there are no Linux > distributions which include it. Therefore, I need some votes in favor... +1 Cheers,

Re: ITP: checkx-0.1.0-1

cgf said: > It takes five votes for inclusion, not three. From > : > >"If the package is not included in any major Linux distro it must >receive five positive votes from other package mantainers in order to >be accepted." Oops. Obviously, I thought it

Re: ITP: checkx-0.1.0-1

On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 01:08:39PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: >On Fri, 05 May 2006 20:54:33 -0400, "Charles Wilson" said: >> checkX is a little utility I wrote that tests to see if (a) the X11 >> client DLLs are installed on the machine, and (b) the Xserver on >> $DISPLAY (or -d x.x.x.x:x) is r

Re: ITP: checkx-0.1.0-1

> Charles Wilson wrote: > checkx does not yet have a home for ongoing development, save my hard > drive, so there's no "upstream" site, and obviously there are no Linux > distributions which include it. Therefore, I need some votes in > favor... +1. John.

Re: ITP: checkx-0.1.0-1

On Fri, 05 May 2006 20:54:33 -0400, "Charles Wilson" said: > checkX is a little utility I wrote that tests to see if (a) the X11 > client DLLs are installed on the machine, and (b) the Xserver on > $DISPLAY (or -d x.x.x.x:x) is running and usable. > checkx does not yet have a home for ongoing d

Re: ITP: checkx-0.1.0-1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Charles Wilson wrote: > checkx does not yet have a home for ongoing development, save my hard > drive, so there's no "upstream" site, and obviously there are no Linux > distributions which include it. Therefore, I need some votes in favor... +1. Ya

Re: ITP: checkx-0.1.0-1

> Charles Wilson writes: > checkx does not yet have a home for ongoing development, save my hard > drive, so there's no "upstream" site, and obviously there are no Linux > distributions which include it. Therefore, I need some votes in > favor... +1 Ciao Volker

Re: ITP: checkx-0.1.0-1

> > checkx does not yet have a home for ongoing development, save my hard > drive, so there's no "upstream" site, and obviously there are no Linux > distributions which include it. Therefore, I need some votes in favor... You have mine. If I can ever get enough time to get emacs to build reli