On May 13 12:18, Marco Atzeri via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> On 11.05.2023 15:57, Andrew Schulman via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> > > Entrusted with these strange superpowers, the following god-like beings
> > > walk unknown amongst us:
> > >
> > > Achim Gratz
> > > Corinna Vinschen
> > > Ken Brown
> > > Marco
> On 11.05.2023 15:57, Andrew Schulman via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> >> Entrusted with these strange superpowers, the following god-like beings
> >> walk unknown amongst us:
> >>
> >> Achim Gratz
> >> Corinna Vinschen
> >> Ken Brown
> >> Marco Atzeri
> >
> > Hippos! https://cygwin.com/goldstars/
> >
>
On 11.05.2023 15:57, Andrew Schulman via Cygwin-apps wrote:
Entrusted with these strange superpowers, the following god-like beings
walk unknown amongst us:
Achim Gratz
Corinna Vinschen
Ken Brown
Marco Atzeri
Hippos! https://cygwin.com/goldstars/
I have the impression that Jon is also in th
> Entrusted with these strange superpowers, the following god-like beings
> walk unknown amongst us:
>
> Achim Gratz
> Corinna Vinschen
> Ken Brown
> Marco Atzeri
Hippos! https://cygwin.com/goldstars/
On 01/12/2022 19:41, Jon Turney wrote:
On 04/11/2022 13:05, Chad Dougherty wrote:
On 2022-11-04 08:34, Jon Turney wrote:
[...]
Well, maybe.
I think a common way for distros to handle this is to have some subset
of maintainers who are allowed to make NMUs for these "important" updates.
The
Dne 05.12.2022 v 21:54 Jon Turney via Cygwin-apps napsal(a):
On 01/12/2022 20:18, Libor Ukropec wrote:
Dne 01.12.2022 v 20:41 Jon Turney napsal(a):
On 17/11/2022 10:24, Libor Ukropec wrote:
>
> If that's not what the desired outcome here, please let me know.
I wanted that.
Sorry for taki
Dne 02.12.2022 v 9:20 Marco Atzeri napsal(a):
On 01.12.2022 21:18, Libor Ukropec wrote:
Dne 01.12.2022 v 20:41 Jon Turney napsal(a):
On 17/11/2022 10:24, Libor Ukropec wrote:
Dne 16.11.2022 v 12:52 Thomas Wolff napsal(a):
What I do not want to do is the violent take over, so I gave some time
On 01/12/2022 20:18, Libor Ukropec wrote:
Dne 01.12.2022 v 20:41 Jon Turney napsal(a):
On 17/11/2022 10:24, Libor Ukropec wrote:
>
> If that's not what the desired outcome here, please let me know.
I wanted that.
Sorry for taking so long over this.
I guess somebody should ping Michael Wi
On 01.12.2022 21:18, Libor Ukropec wrote:
Dne 01.12.2022 v 20:41 Jon Turney napsal(a):
On 17/11/2022 10:24, Libor Ukropec wrote:
Dne 16.11.2022 v 12:52 Thomas Wolff napsal(a):
What I do not want to do is the violent take over, so I gave some
time to the original owner of the python-paramiko
Dne 01.12.2022 v 20:41 Jon Turney napsal(a):
On 17/11/2022 10:24, Libor Ukropec wrote:
Dne 16.11.2022 v 12:52 Thomas Wolff napsal(a):
What I do not want to do is the violent take over, so I gave some time to the original
owner of the python-paramiko to respond. I created a bug on github.com
Jon Turney writes:
> The current upload policy is:
> - Only the maintainer for a package maintainer is allowed to upload
> that package.
> - If a package is orphaned (has no maintainer), there are some
> "trusted" maintainers who are allowed to upload it.
>
> I'm kind of inclined to relax that
On 04/11/2022 13:05, Chad Dougherty wrote:
On 2022-11-04 08:34, Jon Turney wrote:
The second is not so clear: A package is orphaned if it's maintainer
is not responsive to queries as to if they still want to be the
maintainer of the package.
It's undefined how many times we should ping, or ho
On 17/11/2022 10:24, Libor Ukropec wrote:
Dne 16.11.2022 v 12:52 Thomas Wolff napsal(a):
What I do not want to do is the violent take over, so I gave some
time to the original owner of the python-paramiko to respond. I
created a bug on github.com almost 2 weeks ago and so far no
reaction: h
On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 11:24:38 +0100, Libor Ukropec wrote:
the cygport is executing in "src_test" some python tests that in the end requires some
python packages not available as cygwin packages (typing_extensions, mock, pytest-mock,
may be others).
So should I
a) remove the test? (this is not my
Dne 16.11.2022 v 12:52 Thomas Wolff napsal(a):
What I do not want to do is the violent take over, so I gave some time to the original
owner of the python-paramiko to respond. I created a bug on github.com almost 2 weeks
ago and so far no reaction: https://github.com/wildmichael/cygwin/issues/
Am 15/11/2022 um 19:47 schrieb Libor Ukropec:
Dne 04.11.2022 v 14:05 Chad Dougherty napsal(a):
On 2022-11-04 08:34, Jon Turney wrote:
The second is not so clear: A package is orphaned if it's maintainer
is not responsive to queries as to if they still want to be the
maintainer of the packag
Dne 04.11.2022 v 14:05 Chad Dougherty napsal(a):
On 2022-11-04 08:34, Jon Turney wrote:
The second is not so clear: A package is orphaned if it's maintainer
is not responsive to queries as to if they still want to be the maintainer of
the package.
It's undefined how many times we should ping,
On 2022-11-04 08:34, Jon Turney wrote:
The second is not so clear: A package is orphaned if it's maintainer
is not responsive to queries as to if they still want to be the
maintainer of the package.
It's undefined how many times we should ping, or how long we should wait
for a response, but I
On 02/11/2022 20:04, Libor Ukropec wrote:
Hello Michael, Marco,
any update for paramiko and Python 3.9? I'd like to update duplicity
that depends on the paramiko lib and because the default Python is 3.9 I
hit the wall.
Also I do not see the paramiko in the GIT repositories
(https://www.cyg
Hello Michael, Marco,
any update for paramiko and Python 3.9? I'd like to update duplicity that depends on the
paramiko lib and because the default Python is 3.9 I hit the wall.
Also I do not see the paramiko in the GIT repositories
(https://www.cygwin.com/git-cygwin-packages/?a=project_list;
On 23.01.2022 23:17, Marco Atzeri wrote:
Michael,
can you please add the python39
$ cygcheck -cd |grep paramiko
python36-paramiko 2.7.2-0
python37-paramiko 2.7.2-0
python38-paramiko 2.7.2-0
and please avoid the usage of
21 matches
Mail list logo
