Hallo Corinna,
Am Donnerstag, 23. September 2004 um 13:40 schriebst du:
> On Sep 23 13:31, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>> Well, we could start now with all packages that have GNOME / gnome in
>> their name and put these below a GNOME directory, anyway, I think this
>> is ok (unless there are objection
On Sep 23 13:31, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
> Well, we could start now with all packages that have GNOME / gnome in
> their name and put these below a GNOME directory, anyway, I think this
> is ok (unless there are objections).
One argument against this is that all mirrors will delete the files and
pu
Hallo Yaakov,
Am Donnerstag, 23. September 2004 um 04:01 schriebst du:
> Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>> Hallo Yaakov,
>>
>> Uploaded.
> Thanks, but you put these into a dir called libglade, and the package is
> called libglade2. Could you fix this, please?
Oh, Mist;) It was really too late yester
On Sep 22 22:01, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
> >Hallo Yaakov,
> >
> >Uploaded.
>
> Thanks, but you put these into a dir called libglade, and the package is
> called libglade2. Could you fix this, please?
Done.
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mai
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Hallo Yaakov,
Uploaded.
Thanks, but you put these into a dir called libglade, and the package is
called libglade2. Could you fix this, please?
BTW, what ever happened with putting all the core GNOME stuff in it's
own directory, like X11?
Yaakov
Hallo Yaakov,
Am Mittwoch, 8. September 2004 um 01:14 schriebst du:
> As part of the Gnome2 porting effort, I would like to contribute
> libglade to the Cygwin distribution.
Uploaded.
Gerrit
--
=^..^=
