Corinna,
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 10:56:02AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> I won't update inetutils anymore, except for tiny fixes and packaging
> stuff. Actually I'd rather OBSOLETE it entirely. syslogd is replaced
> by syslog-ng and all other tools in inetutils are security holes all in
> it
On Feb 18 14:14, Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
> > Corinna Vinschen writes:
> > sysvinit has no maintainer for ages. We should just pull it from the
> > distro if we don't find a maintainer this week. We can replace it with
> > an empty package which has util-linux as dependency.
>
> I
> Corinna Vinschen writes:
> On Feb 17 01:25, Yaakov (Cygwin Ports) wrote:
>> Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
>> | last conflicts with last from sysvinit-2.84-4
>>
>> This makes sense, but removing it from util-linux will require a
>> simultaneous rename of -4 to -5,
On Feb 17 01:25, Yaakov (Cygwin Ports) wrote:
> Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
> | last conflicts with last from sysvinit-2.84-4
>
> This makes sense, but removing it from util-linux will require a
> simultaneous rename of -4 to -5, otherwise /usr/bin/last will go missing
> entirely.
sysvinit ha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
| util-linux-2.13.1-1 has the following two conflicting binaries:
Ooops. Why do these basic programs have to be provided by SO many
sources? (kill, for instance, is included with cygwin, is a bash
built-in, and can be provi
