On Mar 7 12:44, Warren Young wrote:
> On Mar 5, 2016, at 6:22 AM, Achim Gratz wrote:
> >
> > Corinna Vinschen writes:
> >> More important to me is that the maintainer-to-be subscribes to the
> >> cygwin user mailing list as well as the cygwin-apps maintainer mailing
> >> list and promises to scn
On Mar 5, 2016, at 6:22 AM, Achim Gratz wrote:
>
> Corinna Vinschen writes:
>> More important to me is that the maintainer-to-be subscribes to the
>> cygwin user mailing list as well as the cygwin-apps maintainer mailing
>> list and promises to scna the list for user problems with his/her
>> pack
Hi all,
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Marco Atzeri wrote:
>
> attached a modified version that solve that issue
> and split the package in shared lib and development
>
> libSBML should be fine with with it.
>
Many thanks to Marco for fixing the cygport file. I used it to redo
the packaging an
My bad. Marco had already sent the corrected cygport file.
Best,
- Subhasis
On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Subhasis Ray wrote:
> Hi,
> Thanks for all the feedback. I feel that it is better to get moose
> included in debian first since the primary development and usage
> platform for it is Uni
Hi,
Thanks for all the feedback. I feel that it is better to get moose
included in debian first since the primary development and usage
platform for it is Unix/Linux anyway.
For libsbml, I am not sure how to separate the include headers and
the dll into two packages with cygport. Any pointer
Corinna Vinschen writes:
> More important to me is that the maintainer-to-be subscribes to the
> cygwin user mailing list as well as the cygwin-apps maintainer mailing
> list and promises to scna the list for user problems with his/her
> package.
s/scna/scan/ I suppose?
Regards,
Achim.
--
+<[Q+
On Mar 4 21:03, Marco Atzeri wrote:
> On 03/03/2016 22:19, Subhasis Ray wrote:
> >Hi Marco, Achim,
> > Thanks for your quick feedback.
> >
> >On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Marco Atzeri wrote:
> >>On 03/03/2016 17:32, Subhasis Ray wrote:
> >>>
> >>>I created working cygport files for both:
>
On 03/03/2016 22:19, Subhasis Ray wrote:
Hi Marco, Achim,
Thanks for your quick feedback.
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Marco Atzeri wrote:
On 03/03/2016 17:32, Subhasis Ray wrote:
I created working cygport files for both:
[cut]
as attachment was better
The contributors guide expl
Hi Marco, Achim,
Thanks for your quick feedback.
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Marco Atzeri wrote:
> On 03/03/2016 17:32, Subhasis Ray wrote:
>>
>> I created working cygport files for both:
>>
> [cut]
>
> as attachment was better
>
The contributors guide explicitly says setup.hint should be
Marco Atzeri writes:
> I see a Moose perl framework that I assume is not the same.
Yes, Moose for Perl is a totally different thing.
Regards,
Achim.
--
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+
Factory and User Sound Singles for Waldorf Q+, Q and microQ:
http://Synth
On 03/03/2016 17:32, Subhasis Ray wrote:
Hi,
Hi Ray
I am willing to maintain cygwin packaging of the MOOSE simulation
environment (http://moose.ncbs.res.in) and its dependency libSBML-core
(http://sbml.org/Software/libSBML). MOOSE is GPL3 and libSBML is LGPL.
I created working cygport file
11 matches
Mail list logo
