Re: Upload: coreutils-5.3.0-9

On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 01:06:58AM +, Eric Blake wrote: >>Eric Blake wrote: >>> >>> (prev: 5.2.1-5, curr: 5.3.0-9) >>> 667 0d599276602fdfd0e72a31929ce260de >> >>The setup hint currently points to 5.3.0-9 as current and 5.3.0-7 as >>prev version. And the above filesize and md5sum come from som

Re: Upload: coreutils-5.3.0-9

> Eric Blake wrote: > > > > (prev: 5.2.1-5, curr: 5.3.0-9) > > 667 0d599276602fdfd0e72a31929ce260de > > > > The setup hint currently points to 5.3.0-9 as current and 5.3.0-7 as prev > version. And the above filesize and md5sum come from something else, > 5.3.0-6(?) not 5.2.1-5. I already aske

Re: Upload: coreutils-5.3.0-9

Eric Blake wrote: (prev: 5.2.1-5, curr: 5.3.0-9) 667 0d599276602fdfd0e72a31929ce260de The setup hint currently points to 5.3.0-9 as current and 5.3.0-7 as prev version. And the above filesize and md5sum come from something else, 5.3.0-6(?) not 5.2.1-5. Anyway you have to edit it setup.i

Re: Upload: coreutils-5.3.0-9

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Eric Blake on 7/13/2005 7:10 AM: > You can delete coreutils-5.3.0-7. If someone tries back-revving cygwin, they will also need to back-rev coreutils, since coreutils-5.3.0-7 and beyond use strtoimax (and others) introduced in cygwin-1.5.1

Re: Upload: coreutils-5.3.0-9

Eric Blake wrote: setup.hint remains unchanged. (Does anyone know of a free web hosting location that lets me host more than 25 meg? You'd think for the monthly rates I'm paying my ISP that they would be more competitive in storage size offered...) sourceware.org? Gerrit

Re: Upload: coreutils-5.3.0-9

Ross Smith II wrote: > > lists 69 of them, including one that offers 1000 megs and one that offers 555 > megs. I'm sure there are

Re: Upload: coreutils-5.3.0-9

Eric Blake wrote On 7/13/2005 6:10 AM -0800: > setup.hint remains unchanged. (Does anyone know of a free web hosting > location that lets me host more than 25 meg?

RE: Upload: coreutils-5.3.0-9

> (Does anyone know of a free web hosting location that lets me > host more than 25 meg? I don't, sorry. Wish I did. > You'd think for the monthly rates I'm > paying my ISP that they would be more competitive in storage > size offered...) > AT&T is worse. Last I checked (a month or so ago

RE: Upload: coreutils-5.3.0-9

Original Message >From: Eric Blake >Sent: 13 July 2005 15:55 >>> That's ok. I hope you understand that I'll have to dock your pay >>> though. :-) >> >> What? He gets payed? >> >> >> Gerrit > > Hey, I'm in the enviable position where a 25% raise would give me the > same salary from

RE: Upload: coreutils-5.3.0-9

Eric Blake wrote on Wednesday, July 13, 2005 4:55 PM: [snip] > Seriously, though, is there anything we can add to the upset > script, such as seeing whether "tar tjvf" works on .tar.bz2 > files, to make sure that we can detect this problem sooner if it ever > happens again? Test the md5 sum? -

Re: Upload: coreutils-5.3.0-9

> > That's ok. I hope you understand that I'll have to dock your pay though. > > :-) > > What? He gets payed? > > > Gerrit Hey, I'm in the enviable position where a 25% raise would give me the same salary from cygwin as a 25% cut. Isn't multiplication by 0 fun? :) Seriously, though, is t

Re: Upload: coreutils-5.3.0-9

Christopher Faylor wrote: That's ok. I hope you understand that I'll have to dock your pay though. :-) What? He gets payed? Gerrit

Re: Upload: coreutils-5.3.0-9

On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 07:10:22AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >Hash: SHA1 > >Coreutils changes from 5.3.0-7: >+ fix mv, ln, and ls .exe magic bugs reported to the list with regards to >virtual directories (/cygdrive, /dev/null, etc.) >+ fix ln -s .exe magic when so