On Wed, 03 Apr 2002 13:11:53 EST, Brian Keener
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> wrote:
>> > As for the &'s, I wonder if it's a w32api reference issue? The compiler
>>
>> > complains if they are present for me.
>>
>> For me it is the opposite. g++ complains when they are *not*
>>
>> present.
>>
>I
wrote:
> > As for the &'s, I wonder if it's a w32api reference issue? The compiler
>
> > complains if they are present for me.
>
> For me it is the opposite. g++ complains when they are *not*
>
> present.
>
I believe this might be related to the above discussion so I thought I would
add this
Hello Robert,
Friday, March 29, 2002, 10:44:23 AM, you wrote:
>> Btw I don't think my question is related to this is issue but
>> still... I notice there is a dummy column in the list view
>> after the "Package" column - is this a feature ? If so what
>> is its purpose ?
RC> There shouldn't b
> -Original Message-
> From: Pavel Tsekov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 8:42 PM
> To: Robert Collins
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re[2]: Patch for Setup.exe problem and for mklink2.cc
>
>
> Hello Robert,
>
> Friday,
Hello Robert,
Friday, March 29, 2002, 10:25:08 AM, you wrote:
>> > Found the problem causing the segment violation and probably
>> > causing Jonas Eriksson's problem. It is a typical case of
>> > 'off by 1'. In PickView::set_headers the loop filling the
>> > window header does one iteration to
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Collins
> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 1:11 AM
> To: Ton van Overbeek; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Patch for Setup.exe problem and for mklink2.cc
>
>
>
>
> &
[snip]
> >
> > There have been a few of these off-by-ones in Setup. Is it
> > possible your habit of using 1-based arrays is a contributing
> > factor Rob? This isn't a convention I see much (modulo
> > "Numerical Recipies"); is there a reason you use this convention?
>
> Errm, there aren't any
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gary R Van Sickle
> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 4:48 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Patch for Setup.exe problem and for mklink2.cc
>
>
> [snip]
>
&
[snip]
> > Found the problem causing the segment violation and probably
> > causing Jonas Eriksson's problem. It is a typical case of
> > 'off by 1'. In PickView::set_headers the loop filling the
> > window header does one iteration too much, resulting in a
> > call to DoInsertItem with a NU
Robert wrote:
> I'll check the off-by-one fix in tomorrow, as I'm off to bed now.
>
> As for the &'s, I wonder if it's a w32api reference issue? The compiler
> complains if they are present for me.
For me it is the opposite. g++ complains when they are *not*
present.
The w32api include
> -Original Message-
> From: Ton van Overbeek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 1:03 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Patch for Setup.exe problem and for mklink2.cc
>
>
> Found the
Found the problem causing the segment violation and probably causing
Jonas Eriksson's problem. It is a typical case of 'off by 1'.
In PickView::set_headers the loop filling the window header does one
iteration too much, resulting in a call to DoInsertItem with a NULL
string pointer and hence a cra
12 matches
Mail list logo
