Max Bowsher wrote at Thu, 8 Jan 2004 21:58:38 -:
> But I've been intending to "just" fix some of the problems
> first, and never got around to an actual release. I should
> probably do that now, and tackle the problems after.
Actually, I found a problem with the 0.2.25 I compiled, but not
wit
Frédéric L. W. Meunier wrote:
> Max Bowsher wrote on Sat, 29 Nov 2003 21:02:29 -:
>
>> I just ran "make check" on the patchutils package I was
>> preparing:
>> 33 of 112 tests failed
>> So, I went back and ran "make check" on the current Cygwin
>> patchutils package:
>> 32 of 109 tests failed
>
Max Bowsher wrote on Sat, 29 Nov 2003 21:02:29 -:
> I just ran "make check" on the patchutils package I was
> preparing:
> 33 of 112 tests failed
> So, I went back and ran "make check" on the current Cygwin
> patchutils package:
> 32 of 109 tests failed
> The failures were a selection of SIGA
I just ran "make check" on the patchutils package I was preparing:
33 of 112 tests failed
So, I went back and ran "make check" on the current Cygwin patchutils
package:
32 of 109 tests failed
The failures were a selection of SIGABRTs, core dumps, and errors.
Should I package a simple update to th
