Re: Concerning Python patch 3.6.12-socketmodule.patch -- ping Marco

2023-02-14 Thread Marco Atzeri via Cygwin-apps
On 11.02.2023 07:41, Mark Geisert via Cygwin-apps wrote: Hi Marco, When I said "could you handle" I meant I would author the revised patch, test it locally, and pass it on to you to integrate into the Cygwin Python packages.  Does that sound workable to you? Thank you, ..mark no objection

Concerning Python patch 3.6.12-socketmodule.patch -- ping Marco

2023-02-10 Thread Mark Geisert via Cygwin-apps
Hi Marco, When I said "could you handle" I meant I would author the revised patch, test it locally, and pass it on to you to integrate into the Cygwin Python packages. Does that sound workable to you? Thank you, ..mark Forwarded Message Subject: Concerning Py

Concerning Python patch 3.6.12-socketmodule.patch

2022-11-07 Thread Mark Geisert
Hi Marco, Recently there's been a complaint about that patch on the Cygwin mailing list. The patch was meant to allow same-machine communication between Cygwin Python programs via an AF_UNIX socket. The patch works because both ends of the connection are Python programs that have the patch.