Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>
> Then it would be better to not split the package in several parts. I
> include all the docs and manuals in the main package e.g. with gcc or
> perl and with small packages I don't even think about splitting. On the
> other hand my doc packages doesn't require anything
Dave schrieb:
> Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> pcre requires pcre-doc. Isn't it possible to use pcre without having
>> the docs installed?
>>
> Well, I'd say it isn't possible to use _any_ package without RTFMing, in the
> most general case!
:-)
> I think that making sure the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
> pcre requires pcre-doc. Isn't it possible to use pcre without having
> the docs installed?
Probably. When I took over pcre due to the security vulnerability, I
wondered about this as well, but I decided to leave the status-q
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
> Hello,
>
> pcre requires pcre-doc. Isn't it possible to use pcre without having
> the docs installed?
>
Well, I'd say it isn't possible to use _any_ package without RTFMing, in the
most general case!
I think that making sure the docs get installed along with the
Hello,
pcre requires pcre-doc. Isn't it possible to use pcre without having
the docs installed?
Gerrit
--
=^..^=
