Re: [RFU] mingw-w64

2012-07-02 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jul 2 17:43, JonY wrote: > On 7/2/2012 17:22, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > Hi Jon, > > > > On Jul 1 01:08, JonY wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> Here are the new builds, please remove the oldest versions from each > >> category, thanks. > > > > may I ask you a favor? It would be really helpful if

Re: [RFU] mingw-w64

2012-07-02 Thread JonY
On 7/2/2012 17:22, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > Hi Jon, > > On Jul 1 01:08, JonY wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Here are the new builds, please remove the oldest versions from each >> category, thanks. > > may I ask you a favor? It would be really helpful if you could add > a statement what versions exactly

Re: [RFU] mingw-w64

2012-07-02 Thread Corinna Vinschen
Hi Jon, On Jul 1 01:08, JonY wrote: > Hi, > > Here are the new builds, please remove the oldest versions from each > category, thanks. may I ask you a favor? It would be really helpful if you could add a statement what versions exactly to remove, perhaps even in the form of an easy `rm' comma

[RFU] mingw-w64

2012-06-30 Thread JonY
Hi, Here are the new builds, please remove the oldest versions from each category, thanks. https://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin%20Snapshots/dist/mingw64-i686-runtime/mingw64-i686-runtime-3.0b_svn5134-1-src.tar.bz2 https://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin%20Snaps

Re: [RFU] mingw-w64

2012-03-18 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 10:12:08AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 10:06:24PM +0800, JonY wrote: >>Btw, do I need to submit an announce message for each package? > >No, you don't need to send a separate announcement for each package. > >>Some announcements tend to disappea

Re: [RFU] mingw-w64

2012-03-18 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 10:06:24PM +0800, JonY wrote: >Btw, do I need to submit an announce message for each package? No, you don't need to send a separate announcement for each package. >Some announcements tend to disappear. Actualy, it's more likely that some senders of email tend to ignore bo

[RFU] mingw-w64

2012-03-18 Thread JonY
Hi, New refresh is up, please remove the oldest version from each package except pthreads. Thanks. Btw, do I need to submit an announce message for each package? Some announcements tend to disappear. http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin%20Snapshots/dist/mingw64-x86_64/mingw6

Re: [RFU] mingw-w64 crt/headers

2012-01-09 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jan 8 08:06, JonY wrote: > Hi, > > there was a bug that caused GCC to spill spurious warnings about printf > formats. This release fixes it. > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin%20Snapshots/dist/mingw64-i686/mingw64-i686-headers/mingw64-i686-headers-3.0b_svn4725-1.tar.b

[RFU] mingw-w64 crt/headers

2012-01-07 Thread JonY
Hi, there was a bug that caused GCC to spill spurious warnings about printf formats. This release fixes it. http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin%20Snapshots/dist/mingw64-i686/mingw64-i686-headers/mingw64-i686-headers-3.0b_svn4725-1.tar.bz2 http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-

Re: [RFU] mingw-w64

2011-12-20 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Dec 20 19:45, JonY wrote: > Hi, > > Here's the fixed binutils for i686 mingw-w64. Well, at least it is confirmed > to be working on my machine. > > https://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin%20Snapshots/dist/mingw64-i686/mingw64-i686-binutils/mingw64-i686-binutils-2.22.51-2-src.t

Re: [RFU] mingw-w64

2011-12-20 Thread JonY
Hi, Here's the fixed binutils for i686 mingw-w64. Well, at least it is confirmed to be working on my machine. https://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin%20Snapshots/dist/mingw64-i686/mingw64-i686-binutils/mingw64-i686-binutils-2.22.51-2-src.tar.bz2 https://sourceforge.net/projects/m

Re: [RFU] mingw-w64

2011-12-20 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Dec 19 21:24, JonY wrote: > On 12/19/2011 08:42, Charles Wilson wrote: > > On 12/17/2011 11:35 PM, JonY wrote: > >> New mingw-w64 build is ready. Remove the oldest in each category, > >> leave pthreads. > > > > A user requested a recent bugfix to be propagated. > Sorry for the inconvenience, c

Re: [RFU] mingw-w64

2011-12-19 Thread JonY
On 12/19/2011 08:42, Charles Wilson wrote: > On 12/17/2011 11:35 PM, JonY wrote: >> New mingw-w64 build is ready. Remove the oldest in each category, >> leave pthreads. > A user requested a recent bugfix to be propagated. Sorry for the inconvenience, can you remove the recently uploaded headers a

Re: [RFU] mingw-w64

2011-12-18 Thread Charles Wilson
On 12/17/2011 11:35 PM, JonY wrote: New mingw-w64 build is ready. Remove the oldest in each category, leave pthreads. Done. -- Chuck

Re: [RFU] mingw-w64

2011-12-18 Thread JonY
On 12/19/2011 05:12, Cary R. wrote: > Hi Jon, > > It would be very nice if the headers/runtime could be from svn 4683 or later. > 4683 fixed a problem regarding SSIZE_MAX that prevents me from > cross-compiling Icarus Verilog without performing a manual hack to the code. > Since I have a soluti

[RFU] mingw-w64

2011-12-17 Thread JonY
Hi, New mingw-w64 build is ready. Remove the oldest in each category, leave pthreads. Thanks. https://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin%20Snapshots/dist/mingw64-i686/mingw64-i686-binutils/mingw64-i686-binutils-2.22.51-1-src.tar.bz2 https://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/

Re: [RFU] mingw-w64

2011-08-31 Thread Charles Wilson
On 8/31/2011 10:08 PM, JonY wrote: > On 8/31/2011 21:54, Charles Wilson wrote: >> On 8/31/2011 5:48 AM, JonY wrote: Hmm. don't know what the >> correct (mingw[64]) solution for this would be. In the past, when >> the C++ ABI changed, we didn't bump the libstdc++ DLL number, >> because so many other

Re: [RFU] mingw-w64

2011-08-31 Thread JonY
On 8/31/2011 21:54, Charles Wilson wrote: > On 8/31/2011 5:48 AM, JonY wrote: >> On 8/31/2011 17:11, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >>> On Aug 31 15:15, JonY wrote: BTW, is GCC 4.6 for Cygwin anywhere near? :) >>> >>> 4.5.3 is near, afaik. >> >> OK, I was wondering how to transition 4.5.x to 4.6.x fo

Re: [RFU] mingw-w64

2011-08-31 Thread JonY
On 8/31/2011 22:12, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Aug 31 09:54, Charles Wilson wrote: >> On 8/31/2011 5:48 AM, JonY wrote: >>> C++ ABI for 4.6.x has also changed for mingw* (including mingw.org) >>> with the introduction of thiscall, not sure if this will affect >>> Cygwin itself. >> [...] >> OTOH,

Re: [RFU] mingw-w64

2011-08-31 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Aug 31 09:54, Charles Wilson wrote: > On 8/31/2011 5:48 AM, JonY wrote: > > C++ ABI for 4.6.x has also changed for mingw* (including mingw.org) > > with the introduction of thiscall, not sure if this will affect > > Cygwin itself. > [...] > OTOH, the cygwin project DOES provide several precompil

Re: [RFU] mingw-w64

2011-08-31 Thread Charles Wilson
On 8/31/2011 5:48 AM, JonY wrote: > On 8/31/2011 17:11, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> On Aug 31 15:15, JonY wrote: >>> BTW, is GCC 4.6 for Cygwin anywhere near? :) >> >> 4.5.3 is near, afaik. > > OK, I was wondering how to transition 4.5.x to 4.6.x for mingw-w64 > when the time comes, pthreads-win32

Re: [RFU] mingw-w64

2011-08-31 Thread JonY
On 8/31/2011 17:11, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Aug 31 15:15, JonY wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Here's a refresh of the mingw-w64. >> >> For the headers and runtime, remove 4075 and 4214, for both i686 and x86_64 >> archs. >> Please remove the oldest version for the others. > > Done. Btw., would you min

Re: [RFU] mingw-w64

2011-08-31 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Aug 31 15:15, JonY wrote: > Hi, > > Here's a refresh of the mingw-w64. > > For the headers and runtime, remove 4075 and 4214, for both i686 and x86_64 > archs. > Please remove the oldest version for the others. Done. Btw., would you mind to restructure your download directories so that they

[RFU] mingw-w64

2011-08-31 Thread JonY
Hi, Here's a refresh of the mingw-w64. For the headers and runtime, remove 4075 and 4214, for both i686 and x86_64 archs. Please remove the oldest version for the others. BTW, is GCC 4.6 for Cygwin anywhere near? :) Thanks. http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin%20Snapshots/di

Re: [RFU] mingw-w64

2011-08-11 Thread JonY
On 8/12/2011 02:28, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: > On 11 August 2011 12:13, JonY wrote: >> OK, much thanks, I need to find more time to do a full rebuild next time. > > Any chance we can get a 4.6.x release when you get around to it? > > Thank you, > > Chris > Well, that kind of means dropping ada,

Re: [RFU] mingw-w64

2011-08-11 Thread Chris Sutcliffe
On 11 August 2011 12:13, JonY wrote: > OK, much thanks, I need to find more time to do a full rebuild next time. Any chance we can get a 4.6.x release when you get around to it? Thank you, Chris -- Chris Sutcliffe http://emergedesktop.org http://www.google.com/profiles/ir0nh34d

Re: [RFU] mingw-w64

2011-08-11 Thread JonY
On 8/11/2011 20:32, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Aug 11 19:16, JonY wrote: >> Hi, >> >> here's the headers and runtime refresh, binutils and gcc should still be >> good. >> Keep the older copies. >> >> wget >> http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin%20Snapshots/dist/mingw64-i686/min

Re: [RFU] mingw-w64

2011-08-11 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Aug 11 19:16, JonY wrote: > Hi, > > here's the headers and runtime refresh, binutils and gcc should still be good. > Keep the older copies. > > wget > http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin%20Snapshots/dist/mingw64-i686/mingw64-i686-headers/mingw64-i686-headers-3.0b_svn4373-1.t

[RFU] mingw-w64

2011-08-11 Thread JonY
Hi, here's the headers and runtime refresh, binutils and gcc should still be good. Keep the older copies. wget http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin%20Snapshots/dist/mingw64-i686/mingw64-i686-headers/mingw64-i686-headers-3.0b_svn4373-1.tar.bz2 \ http://sourceforge.net/projects/m

Re: [RFU] mingw-w64 updates

2011-03-15 Thread Charles Wilson
On 3/15/2011 11:20 AM, JonY wrote: > Here's an update for mingw-w64 packages, see the attached list.txt for > wget links. SF should really allow anonymous read-only FTP. > > Please keep the previous version and remove the others. Done. -- Chuck

[RFU] mingw-w64 updates

2011-03-15 Thread JonY
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Here's an update for mingw-w64 packages, see the attached list.txt for wget links. SF should really allow anonymous read-only FTP. Please keep the previous version and remove the others. Thanks. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0