Re: [RFC] Minimal Debuginfo by default

2017-11-19 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz
On 2017-11-15 03:09, David Stacey wrote: > On 15/11/17 07:38, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: >> The following concept would allow for sensible backtraces without >> installing a -debuginfo, at the expense of a moderate size increase of >> binaries (particularly with C++ code): >> >> https://fedoraproject.

Re: [RFC] Minimal Debuginfo by default

2017-11-17 Thread Jon Turney
On 15/11/2017 07:38, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: The following concept would allow for sensible backtraces without installing a -debuginfo, at the expense of a moderate size increase of binaries (particularly with C++ code): https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/MingwMiniDebugInfo The patch for cy

Re: [RFC] Minimal Debuginfo by default

2017-11-15 Thread David Stacey
On 15/11/17 07:38, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: The following concept would allow for sensible backtraces without installing a -debuginfo, at the expense of a moderate size increase of binaries (particularly with C++ code): https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/MingwMiniDebugInfo Did you mean http

[RFC] Minimal Debuginfo by default

2017-11-14 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz
The following concept would allow for sensible backtraces without installing a -debuginfo, at the expense of a moderate size increase of binaries (particularly with C++ code): https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/MingwMiniDebugInfo The patch for cygport would be minimal. Is it worth the size i