[PATCH setup 00/10] Various setup patches

2017-05-23 Thread Jon Turney
Oh, I think I can see a bit of floor over there! Jon Turney (10): isBinary() should return true for orphaned packages Correctly calculate total data to checksum when using IncludeSource Rename category "Misc" to "Orphaned" Make PrereqChecker::setTrust() a static method Move and rename du

Re: [PATCH setup 00/10] Various setup patches

2016-08-04 Thread Achim Gratz
Corinna Vinschen writes: > Oh, no, sorry if I was unclear but I would like the tools just to > adapt so that they don't choke on new formats while still working > happily on the old formats. Oh goody, then we're on the same page. Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb An

Re: [PATCH setup 00/10] Various setup patches

2016-08-04 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Aug 4 19:56, Achim Gratz wrote: > Corinna Vinschen writes: > >> The checksum information has to come from somewhere and that somewhere > >> requires a package install or update. Together with that new setup we > >> might > >> have an update of cygccheck and some unrelated packages that happen

Re: [PATCH setup 00/10] Various setup patches

2016-08-04 Thread Achim Gratz
Corinna Vinschen writes: >> The checksum information has to come from somewhere and that somewhere >> requires a package install or update. Together with that new setup we might >> have an update of cygccheck and some unrelated packages that happen to >> have been rebuilt recently, but certainly n

Re: [PATCH setup 00/10] Various setup patches

2016-08-04 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Aug 3 21:52, Achim Gratz wrote: > Corinna Vinschen writes: > >> People tend to not re-install their whole set of packages just because > >> some new version of setup is announced, > > > > Uhm? If you download a new setup, but then don't update your packages, > > why did you download the latest

Re: [PATCH setup 00/10] Various setup patches

2016-08-03 Thread Achim Gratz
Corinna Vinschen writes: >> People tend to not re-install their whole set of packages just because >> some new version of setup is announced, > > Uhm? If you download a new setup, but then don't update your packages, > why did you download the latest setup at all? If you don't run this > new setu

Re: [PATCH setup 00/10] Various setup patches

2016-08-03 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Aug 3 20:27, Achim Gratz wrote: > Corinna Vinschen writes: > >> That would be either supplemental files with the hashes or some new .lst > >> format which could/should use a different extension anyway since the > >> transition period will be long. > > > > Why? The transition period can be very

Re: [PATCH setup 00/10] Various setup patches

2016-08-03 Thread Achim Gratz
Corinna Vinschen writes: >> That would be either supplemental files with the hashes or some new .lst >> format which could/should use a different extension anyway since the >> transition period will be long. > > Why? The transition period can be very much shortened if we do what > I wrote above.

Re: [PATCH setup 00/10] Various setup patches

2016-08-03 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Aug 3 11:51, Achim Gratz wrote: > Corinna Vinschen writes: > > *If* we do that, the setup files should go under /var/lib/setup. > > Yes. > > > However, why would this make sense exactly? Yes, I know LSB and yada > > yada, but why *exactly* would that make sense in *our* situation? > > In th

Re: [PATCH setup 00/10] Various setup patches

2016-08-03 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Aug 2 16:30, Jon Turney wrote: > Jon Turney (10): > Remove stray execute permissions > Prevent libtool warning that a getopt++ shared library cannot be built > Add lex and yacc generated files to .gitignore > Downgrade "Running preremove script" logging to debug > Properly report prog

Re: [PATCH setup 00/10] Various setup patches

2016-08-03 Thread Achim Gratz
Corinna Vinschen writes: > *If* we do that, the setup files should go under /var/lib/setup. Yes. > However, why would this make sense exactly? Yes, I know LSB and yada > yada, but why *exactly* would that make sense in *our* situation? In this case it's just a clean way to separate the old and

Re: [PATCH setup 00/10] Various setup patches

2016-08-03 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Aug 3 09:10, Achim Gratz wrote: > Jon Turney writes: > > Track if a package was installed by user, or as a dependency > > Add an additional filter view, showing packages which were user picked > > As a suggestion (and I won't have time for implementation help at the > moment): Please consi

Re: [PATCH setup 00/10] Various setup patches

2016-08-03 Thread Achim Gratz
Jon Turney writes: > Track if a package was installed by user, or as a dependency > Add an additional filter view, showing packages which were user picked As a suggestion (and I won't have time for implementation help at the moment): Please consider keeping /etc/setup/installed.db at version 2

[PATCH setup 00/10] Various setup patches

2016-08-02 Thread Jon Turney
Jon Turney (10): Remove stray execute permissions Prevent libtool warning that a getopt++ shared library cannot be built Add lex and yacc generated files to .gitignore Downgrade "Running preremove script" logging to debug Properly report progress in PrereqChecker::isMet Remove obsolete