On Fri, 17 Nov 2006, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 09:57:33AM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
> >
> >I would like to adopt the recently orphaned wget (or maybe I'm just
> >feeling in the mood for another gold star ;).
>
> I'm not even going to check this. I assume that you will fix
On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 12:00:08PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> Which, btw, makes me ask: Have we missed gold stars for any other
> package adopters? I tend to hold off on issuing a gold star until
> the package has already been uploaded so I may have missed somebody.
I'm due two new stars
On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 09:57:33AM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
> I would like to adopt the recently orphaned wget (or maybe I'm just
> feeling in the mood for another gold star ;). No code changes from -1,
> this merely relinks against newer libssl and libintl, adds a preremove
> script, and switches
On 17 November 2006 17:00, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> Which, btw, makes me ask: Have we missed gold stars for any other
> package adopters? I tend to hold off on issuing a gold star until
> the package has already been uploaded so I may have missed somebody.
:) Can I have an experimental g
On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 09:57:33AM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>I would like to adopt the recently orphaned wget (or maybe I'm just
>feeling in the mood for another gold star ;). No code changes from -1,
>this merely relinks against newer libssl and l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I would like to adopt the recently orphaned wget (or maybe I'm just
feeling in the mood for another gold star ;). No code changes from -1,
this merely relinks against newer libssl and libintl, adds a preremove
script, and switches to a cygport framewo
