Re: [ITP] mailutils 3.2

2017-04-20 Thread Ken Brown
On 4/20/2017 2:55 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: On 2017-04-19 15:11, Ken Brown wrote: On 4/19/2017 1:17 PM, Jon Turney wrote: mailutils.cygport: 3.2-missing_tests.patch is listed in SRC_URI. I'm guess this is an error, or it needs to be a URL? No, this was deliberate. There's some kind of gl

Re: [ITP] mailutils 3.2

2017-04-20 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz
On 2017-04-19 15:11, Ken Brown wrote: On 4/19/2017 1:17 PM, Jon Turney wrote: mailutils.cygport: 3.2-missing_tests.patch is listed in SRC_URI. I'm guess this is an error, or it needs to be a URL? No, this was deliberate. There's some kind of glitch in the build system that causes the missin

Re: [ITP] mailutils 3.2

2017-04-19 Thread Ken Brown
On 4/19/2017 1:17 PM, Jon Turney wrote: mailutils.cygport: 3.2-missing_tests.patch is listed in SRC_URI. I'm guess this is an error, or it needs to be a URL? No, this was deliberate. There's some kind of glitch in the build system that causes the missing tests to be removed again, so I have

Re: [ITP] mailutils 3.2

2017-04-19 Thread Jon Turney
On 02/04/2017 23:39, Ken Brown wrote: This is a followup to https://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin-apps/2017-03/msg00054.html Mailutils is packaged by Debian: https://packages.debian.org/jessie/mailutils My packaging closely follows theirs, except that I have split off the unversioned DLLs fro

[ITP] mailutils 3.2

2017-04-02 Thread Ken Brown
This is a followup to https://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin-apps/2017-03/msg00054.html Mailutils is packaged by Debian: https://packages.debian.org/jessie/mailutils My packaging closely follows theirs, except that I have split off the unversioned DLLs from libmailutils5 into a separate package