Re: [ITP] libinih

2023-01-16 Thread Jon Turney via Cygwin-apps
On 15/01/2023 22:49, Adam Dinwoodie via Cygwin-apps wrote: I added this to your packages. NAME=libinih Since the upstream name is just 'inih', the source package should probably be named that also. Can I double-check how that should work from a package naming perspective? I *think* that me

Re: [ITP] libinih

2023-01-15 Thread Adam Dinwoodie via Cygwin-apps
On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 02:27:46PM +, Jon Turney wrote: > On 11/01/2023 23:16, Adam Dinwoodie via Cygwin-apps wrote: > > On Wed 11 Jan 2023 at 03:14:20PM +, Jon Turney wrote: > > > On 09/01/2023 16:32, Adam Dinwoodie via Cygwin-apps wrote: > > > > As requested at [0], I've offered to packag

Re: [ITP] libinih

2023-01-14 Thread Lemures Lemniscati via Cygwin-apps
On Fri, 13 Jan 2023 14:27:46 +, Jon Turney via Cygwin-apps > On 11/01/2023 23:16, Adam Dinwoodie via Cygwin-apps wrote: > > On Wed 11 Jan 2023 at 03:14:20PM +, Jon Turney wrote: > >> On 09/01/2023 16:32, Adam Dinwoodie via Cygwin-apps wrote: > >>> As requested at [0], I've offered to packag

Re: [ITP] libinih

2023-01-13 Thread Jon Turney via Cygwin-apps
On 11/01/2023 23:16, Adam Dinwoodie via Cygwin-apps wrote: On Wed 11 Jan 2023 at 03:14:20PM +, Jon Turney wrote: On 09/01/2023 16:32, Adam Dinwoodie via Cygwin-apps wrote: As requested at [0], I've offered to package libinih for Cygwin. It has a BSD license[1] and is already packaged for a

Re: [ITP] libinih

2023-01-13 Thread Jon Turney via Cygwin-apps
On 11/01/2023 23:16, Adam Dinwoodie via Cygwin-apps wrote: On Wed 11 Jan 2023 at 03:14:20PM +, Jon Turney wrote: On 09/01/2023 16:32, Adam Dinwoodie via Cygwin-apps wrote: As requested at [0], I've offered to package libinih for Cygwin. It has a BSD license[1] and is already packaged for a

Re: [ITP] libinih

2023-01-11 Thread Adam Dinwoodie via Cygwin-apps
On Wed 11 Jan 2023 at 03:14:20PM +, Jon Turney wrote: > On 09/01/2023 16:32, Adam Dinwoodie via Cygwin-apps wrote: > > As requested at [0], I've offered to package libinih for Cygwin. It has > > a BSD license[1] and is already packaged for a bunch of *nix distros, > > including Fedora, Debian

Re: [ITP] libinih

2023-01-11 Thread Jon Turney via Cygwin-apps
On 09/01/2023 16:32, Adam Dinwoodie via Cygwin-apps wrote: As requested at [0], I've offered to package libinih for Cygwin. It has a BSD license[1] and is already packaged for a bunch of *nix distros, including Fedora, Debian and Arch[2]. [0]: https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/2023-January/25

Re: [ITP] libinih

2023-01-11 Thread Lemures Lemniscati via Cygwin-apps
On Mon, 9 Jan 2023 16:32:23 +, Adam Dinwoodie via Cygwin-apps > As requested at [0], I've offered to package libinih for Cygwin. It has > a BSD license[1] and is already packaged for a bunch of *nix distros, > including Fedora, Debian and Arch[2]. > > [0]: https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/

[ITP] libinih

2023-01-09 Thread Adam Dinwoodie via Cygwin-apps
As requested at [0], I've offered to package libinih for Cygwin. It has a BSD license[1] and is already packaged for a bunch of *nix distros, including Fedora, Debian and Arch[2]. [0]: https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/2023-January/252780.html [1]: https://github.com/benhoyt/inih/blob/master/LI