On 15/01/2023 22:49, Adam Dinwoodie via Cygwin-apps wrote:
I added this to your packages.
NAME=libinih
Since the upstream name is just 'inih', the source package should probably
be named that also.
Can I double-check how that should work from a package naming
perspective? I *think* that me
On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 02:27:46PM +, Jon Turney wrote:
> On 11/01/2023 23:16, Adam Dinwoodie via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> > On Wed 11 Jan 2023 at 03:14:20PM +, Jon Turney wrote:
> > > On 09/01/2023 16:32, Adam Dinwoodie via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> > > > As requested at [0], I've offered to packag
On Fri, 13 Jan 2023 14:27:46 +, Jon Turney via Cygwin-apps
> On 11/01/2023 23:16, Adam Dinwoodie via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> > On Wed 11 Jan 2023 at 03:14:20PM +, Jon Turney wrote:
> >> On 09/01/2023 16:32, Adam Dinwoodie via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> >>> As requested at [0], I've offered to packag
On 11/01/2023 23:16, Adam Dinwoodie via Cygwin-apps wrote:
On Wed 11 Jan 2023 at 03:14:20PM +, Jon Turney wrote:
On 09/01/2023 16:32, Adam Dinwoodie via Cygwin-apps wrote:
As requested at [0], I've offered to package libinih for Cygwin. It has
a BSD license[1] and is already packaged for a
On 11/01/2023 23:16, Adam Dinwoodie via Cygwin-apps wrote:
On Wed 11 Jan 2023 at 03:14:20PM +, Jon Turney wrote:
On 09/01/2023 16:32, Adam Dinwoodie via Cygwin-apps wrote:
As requested at [0], I've offered to package libinih for Cygwin. It has
a BSD license[1] and is already packaged for a
On Wed 11 Jan 2023 at 03:14:20PM +, Jon Turney wrote:
> On 09/01/2023 16:32, Adam Dinwoodie via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> > As requested at [0], I've offered to package libinih for Cygwin. It has
> > a BSD license[1] and is already packaged for a bunch of *nix distros,
> > including Fedora, Debian
On 09/01/2023 16:32, Adam Dinwoodie via Cygwin-apps wrote:
As requested at [0], I've offered to package libinih for Cygwin. It has
a BSD license[1] and is already packaged for a bunch of *nix distros,
including Fedora, Debian and Arch[2].
[0]: https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/2023-January/25
On Mon, 9 Jan 2023 16:32:23 +, Adam Dinwoodie via Cygwin-apps
> As requested at [0], I've offered to package libinih for Cygwin. It has
> a BSD license[1] and is already packaged for a bunch of *nix distros,
> including Fedora, Debian and Arch[2].
>
> [0]: https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/
As requested at [0], I've offered to package libinih for Cygwin. It has
a BSD license[1] and is already packaged for a bunch of *nix distros,
including Fedora, Debian and Arch[2].
[0]: https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/2023-January/252780.html
[1]: https://github.com/benhoyt/inih/blob/master/LI