Re: [ITP] cpuid

2020-02-24 Thread Brian Inglis
On 2020-02-23 07:24, Marco Atzeri wrote: > Am 22.02.2020 um 17:59 schrieb Brian Inglis: >> On 2020-02-21 23:24, Marco Atzeri wrote: >>> Am 22.02.2020 um 05:49 schrieb Brian Inglis: I would like to offer to package cpuid:  dumps CPUID information about the CPU(s) The pro

Re: [ITP] cpuid

2020-02-23 Thread Marco Atzeri
Am 22.02.2020 um 17:59 schrieb Brian Inglis: On 2020-02-21 23:24, Marco Atzeri wrote: Am 22.02.2020 um 05:49 schrieb Brian Inglis: I would like to offer to package cpuid: dumps CPUID information about the CPU(s) The program dumps detailed information about the CPU(s) gathered from the CP

Re: [ITP] cpuid

2020-02-22 Thread Brian Inglis
On 2020-02-21 23:24, Marco Atzeri wrote: > Am 22.02.2020 um 05:49 schrieb Brian Inglis: >> I would like to offer to package cpuid: >> >> dumps CPUID information about the CPU(s) >> >> The program dumps detailed information about the CPU(s) gathered from >> the CPUID instruction, and also determ

Re: [ITP] cpuid

2020-02-21 Thread Marco Atzeri
Am 22.02.2020 um 05:49 schrieb Brian Inglis: I would like to offer to package cpuid: dumps CPUID information about the CPU(s) The program dumps detailed information about the CPU(s) gathered from the CPUID instruction, and also determines the exact model of CPU(s). Whereas /proc/cpuinf

[ITP] cpuid

2020-02-21 Thread Brian Inglis
I would like to offer to package cpuid: dumps CPUID information about the CPU(s) The program dumps detailed information about the CPU(s) gathered from the CPUID instruction, and also determines the exact model of CPU(s). Whereas /proc/cpuinfo is like an abstract of the features important

[ITP] cpuid

2020-02-21 Thread Brian Inglis
-- Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada This email may be disturbing to some readers as it contains too much technical detail. Reader discretion is advised.

[ITP] cpuid

2020-02-21 Thread Brian Inglis
-- Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada This email may be disturbing to some readers as it contains too much technical detail. Reader discretion is advised.