On 3/30/2016 8:51 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Mar 22 08:32, Ken Brown wrote:
On 3/22/2016 5:30 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Mar 21 10:13, Ken Brown wrote:
On 3/21/2016 9:06 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Hi Ken,
On Mar 21 08:05, Ken Brown wrote:
On 3/20/2016 4:24 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrot
On Mar 22 08:32, Ken Brown wrote:
> On 3/22/2016 5:30 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Mar 21 10:13, Ken Brown wrote:
> >>On 3/21/2016 9:06 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >>>Hi Ken,
> >>>
> >>>On Mar 21 08:05, Ken Brown wrote:
> On 3/20/2016 4:24 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> >On 2016-03-20
Yaakov Selkowitz writes:
>> Doing that seems to have changed the behaviour of sprintf and now one of
>> the tests involving NaN and the %a format fails. Ideas?
>
> Can you be more specific?
I've finally drilled to the bottom of this (on 64bit so far, but the
issues and workarounds are quite likel
On Mar 22 11:16, Chris Sutcliffe wrote:
> On 18 March 2016 at 17:45, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >
> > [CCed cygwin-apps to reach out to all package maintainers]
> >
> > On Mar 18 16:58, Ken Brown wrote:
> >> If
> >> so, it might be a good idea for maintainers to test that nothing unexpected
> >> hap
On 18 March 2016 at 17:45, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> [CCed cygwin-apps to reach out to all package maintainers]
>
> On Mar 18 16:58, Ken Brown wrote:
>> If
>> so, it might be a good idea for maintainers to test that nothing unexpected
>> happens when they build their packages.
>
> Yes, that's rea
On 3/22/2016 5:30 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Mar 21 10:13, Ken Brown wrote:
On 3/21/2016 9:06 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Hi Ken,
On Mar 21 08:05, Ken Brown wrote:
On 3/20/2016 4:24 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
On 2016-03-20 12:29, Ken Brown wrote:
Never mind. I just sent a report to bu
On Mar 21 10:13, Ken Brown wrote:
> On 3/21/2016 9:06 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >Hi Ken,
> >
> >On Mar 21 08:05, Ken Brown wrote:
> >>On 3/20/2016 4:24 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> >>>On 2016-03-20 12:29, Ken Brown wrote:
> >>Never mind. I just sent a report to bug-gnulib, so you can foll
Yaakov Selkowitz writes:
> On 2016-03-20 14:04, Achim Gratz wrote:
>> Doing that seems to have changed the behaviour of sprintf and now one of
>> the tests involving NaN and the %a format fails. Ideas?
>
> Can you be more specific?
The error is this:
--8<---cut here---sta
On 3/21/2016 9:06 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Hi Ken,
On Mar 21 08:05, Ken Brown wrote:
On 3/20/2016 4:24 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
On 2016-03-20 12:29, Ken Brown wrote:
Never mind. I just sent a report to bug-gnulib, so you can follow up
there.
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnul
Hi Ken,
On Mar 21 08:05, Ken Brown wrote:
> On 3/20/2016 4:24 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> >On 2016-03-20 12:29, Ken Brown wrote:
> Never mind. I just sent a report to bug-gnulib, so you can follow up
> there.
> >>
> >>http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2016-03/msg00054.html
>
On 3/20/2016 4:24 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
On 2016-03-20 12:29, Ken Brown wrote:
Never mind. I just sent a report to bug-gnulib, so you can follow up
there.
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2016-03/msg00054.html
Please check what I wrote in response to Paul and correct any mis
On Mar 20 21:45, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Mar 20 19:19, Achim Gratz wrote:
> > What's going wrong is that the symbols are also defined in libc.a on
> > 32bit and only in libm.a on 64bit. The configury for Cygwin removes
> > both -lc and -lm from the list of libraries that should explicitly be
On Mar 20 19:19, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen writes:
> > These functions are defined on both platforms. What's *not* defined on
> > 64 bit, but only on 32 bit, are the same functions preceeded with an
> > underscore, e.g. _copysign.
> >
> > Can you please check again? There's something
On 2016-03-20 12:29, Ken Brown wrote:
Never mind. I just sent a report to bug-gnulib, so you can follow up
there.
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2016-03/msg00054.html
Please check what I wrote in response to Paul and correct any mistakes I
might have made.
Treating Cygwin just
On 2016-03-20 14:04, Achim Gratz wrote:
Corinna Vinschen writes:
- eaccess is also implicitly defined
eaccess requires setting _GNU_SOURCE.
Doing that seems to have changed the behaviour of sprintf and now one of
the tests involving NaN and the %a format fails. Ideas?
Can you be more spec
Corinna Vinschen writes:
>> - eaccess is also implicitly defined
>
> eaccess requires setting _GNU_SOURCE.
Doing that seems to have changed the behaviour of sprintf and now one of
the tests involving NaN and the %a format fails. Ideas?
Regards,
Achim.
--
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron micr
On 3/20/2016 11:26 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Mar 19 14:03, Ken Brown wrote:
On 3/19/2016 8:34 AM, Ken Brown wrote:
On 3/19/2016 6:32 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Mar 18 22:24, Ken Brown wrote:
On 3/18/2016 7:29 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
On 2016-03-18 18:05, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
Corinna Vinschen writes:
> These functions are defined on both platforms. What's *not* defined on
> 64 bit, but only on 32 bit, are the same functions preceeded with an
> underscore, e.g. _copysign.
>
> Can you please check again? There's something else going wrong here.
What's going wrong is th
On Mar 19 14:03, Ken Brown wrote:
> On 3/19/2016 8:34 AM, Ken Brown wrote:
> >On 3/19/2016 6:32 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >>On Mar 18 22:24, Ken Brown wrote:
> >>>On 3/18/2016 7:29 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> On 2016-03-18 18:05, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> >On 2016-03-18 17:25, Ken Bro
On Mar 20 11:59, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen writes:
> >> If so, it might be a good idea for maintainers to test that nothing
> >> unexpected happens when they build their packages.
> >
> > Yes, that's really a good idea.
>
> I've run a fresh build of Perl on this.
>
> - there's a new s
On Mar 19 23:49, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> On 2016-03-19 05:32, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >Glibc uses __USE_MISC to guard the inclusion of sys/select.h, newlib's
> >header uses __BSD_VISIBLE which is almost the same. But we have the
> >equivalent __MISC_VISIBLE as well. Do you want to change that
On 20/03/2016 11:59, Achim Gratz wrote:
Corinna Vinschen writes:
If so, it might be a good idea for maintainers to test that nothing
unexpected happens when they build their packages.
Yes, that's really a good idea.
I've run a fresh build of Perl on this.
- there's a new signal: SIGIOT
- t
Corinna Vinschen writes:
>> If so, it might be a good idea for maintainers to test that nothing
>> unexpected happens when they build their packages.
>
> Yes, that's really a good idea.
I've run a fresh build of Perl on this.
- there's a new signal: SIGIOT
- two new symbols are found: _POSIX_C_
On 2016-03-19 05:32, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Glibc uses __USE_MISC to guard the inclusion of sys/select.h, newlib's
header uses __BSD_VISIBLE which is almost the same. But we have the
equivalent __MISC_VISIBLE as well. Do you want to change that, Yaakov?
If you want, but with the implementati
On 3/19/2016 8:34 AM, Ken Brown wrote:
On 3/19/2016 6:32 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Mar 18 22:24, Ken Brown wrote:
On 3/18/2016 7:29 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
On 2016-03-18 18:05, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
On 2016-03-18 17:25, Ken Brown wrote:
On 3/18/2016 5:45 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote
On 3/19/2016 6:32 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Mar 18 22:24, Ken Brown wrote:
On 3/18/2016 7:29 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
On 2016-03-18 18:05, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
On 2016-03-18 17:25, Ken Brown wrote:
On 3/18/2016 5:45 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Mar 18 16:58, Ken Brown wrote:
On
On Mar 18 22:24, Ken Brown wrote:
> On 3/18/2016 7:29 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> >On 2016-03-18 18:05, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> >>On 2016-03-18 17:25, Ken Brown wrote:
> >>>On 3/18/2016 5:45 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Mar 18 16:58, Ken Brown wrote:
> >On 3/18/2016 4:34 PM, Corinna
[CCed cygwin-apps to reach out to all package maintainers]
On Mar 18 16:58, Ken Brown wrote:
> On 3/18/2016 4:34 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >I released a new Cygwin TEST version 2.5.0-0.8.
> >
> >If things are not going very wrong, this is basically what you'll
> >get as 2.5.0-1 release. Plea
On 2016-03-18 17:25, Ken Brown wrote:
On 3/18/2016 5:45 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Mar 18 16:58, Ken Brown wrote:
On 3/18/2016 4:34 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
I released a new Cygwin TEST version 2.5.0-0.8.
If things are not going very wrong, this is basically what you'll
get as 2.5.0-1
On 3/18/2016 6:25 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
On 3/18/2016 5:45 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
[CCed cygwin-apps to reach out to all package maintainers]
On Mar 18 16:58, Ken Brown wrote:
On 3/18/2016 4:34 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
I released a new Cygwin TEST version 2.5.0-0.8.
If things are not
On 2016-03-18 18:05, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
On 2016-03-18 17:25, Ken Brown wrote:
On 3/18/2016 5:45 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Mar 18 16:58, Ken Brown wrote:
On 3/18/2016 4:34 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
I released a new Cygwin TEST version 2.5.0-0.8.
If things are not going very wrong,
On 3/18/2016 5:45 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
[CCed cygwin-apps to reach out to all package maintainers]
On Mar 18 16:58, Ken Brown wrote:
On 3/18/2016 4:34 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
I released a new Cygwin TEST version 2.5.0-0.8.
If things are not going very wrong, this is basically what
On 3/18/2016 7:29 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
On 2016-03-18 18:05, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
On 2016-03-18 17:25, Ken Brown wrote:
On 3/18/2016 5:45 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Mar 18 16:58, Ken Brown wrote:
On 3/18/2016 4:34 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
I released a new Cygwin TEST version
33 matches
Mail list logo
