On 2023-09-05 05:48, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote:
On Tue, 5 Sep 2023 12:37:28 +0100
Jon Turney wrote:
On 05/09/2023 10:28, Takashi Yano wrote:
Previous wait time of 100msec is too long if application specifies
smaller buffer. With this patch, the wait time is reduced to 1msec.
I don't
William Hu via Cygwin-apps writes:
> Hi All,
>
> Re OCaml compilers: I should be able to package OCaml 4.14.1 (and hopefully
> an
> alpha version of 5.1.0 as well) for Cygwin in the coming weeks. OCaml 5.0.0
> temporarily dropped Cygwin support so the Cygwin versions will of course skip
> that
William Hu via Cygwin-apps writes:
> On Wednesday, August 30th, 2023, ASSI wrote:
>> NOt immediately, but it makes me wonder if there's other such leakage.
>> I have not found a (text) file that stores this information in the
>> installed package, so it seems that the information is compiled in
>>
On Wednesday, August 30th, 2023, ASSI wrote:
> NOt immediately, but it makes me wonder if there's other such leakage.
> I have not found a (text) file that stores this information in the
> installed package, so it seems that the information is compiled in
> someplace.
After some digging I believe
On Tue, 5 Sep 2023 12:37:28 +0100
Jon Turney wrote:
> On 05/09/2023 10:28, Takashi Yano wrote:
> > Previous wait time of 100msec is too long if application specifies
> > smaller buffer. With this patch, the wait time is reduced to 1msec.
>
> I don't really have the context to understand this chang
On 05/09/2023 10:28, Takashi Yano wrote:
Previous wait time of 100msec is too long if application specifies
smaller buffer. With this patch, the wait time is reduced to 1msec.
I don't really have the context to understand this change, but it seems
to me the obvious questions to ask are:
Are
