On Nov 21 13:39, ASSI wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen writes:
> > The idea is that the installation tree has POSIXy permissions and
> > administrative users have the right to change stuff. The administrators
> > group is part of the user's token if the process has been started
> > elevated, so, to me, t
On Nov 18 12:30, Brian Inglis wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Nov 2022 15:51:34 +, Jon Turney wrote:
> > On 14/11/2022 21:29, Jason Pyeron wrote:
> > > Can I throw resources at a solution? If so what?
>
> > Sure, if that's what you want to do.
> > According surveys, 32-bit Windows has a fraction of 1% mar
Corinna Vinschen writes:
> The idea is that the installation tree has POSIXy permissions and
> administrative users have the right to change stuff. The administrators
> group is part of the user's token if the process has been started
> elevated, so, to me, this looks like a natural choice.
As I
On Nov 20 20:05, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Jon Turney writes:
> > I believe that the intent of the code in setup is that there should
> > only be two modes:
> >
> > USER: install "for me", with the users primary group
>
> As I understand it, the intention here was that the user can have a
> "single use
