Re: New packages: unison2.51+4.04.2, unison2.51+4.10.0

2021-12-22 Thread Jon Turney
On 22/12/2021 19:50, Andrew Schulman via Cygwin-apps wrote: Since I marked unison2.51+4.04.2 as obsoletes: unison2.51, it seems that unison2.51 now needs to be removed as a separate package? calm says: ERROR: package 'unison2.51' is at paths unison2.51 and unison2.51+4.10.0/unison2.51 this say

Re: New packages: unison2.51+4.04.2, unison2.51+4.10.0

2021-12-22 Thread Andrew Schulman via Cygwin-apps
> > Since I marked unison2.51+4.04.2 as obsoletes: unison2.51, it seems that > > unison2.51 now needs to be removed as a separate package? calm says: > > > > ERROR: package 'unison2.51' is at paths unison2.51 and > > unison2.51+4.10.0/unison2.51 > > this says that unison2.51+4.10.0 obsolets uniso

Re: New packages: unison2.51+4.04.2, unison2.51+4.10.0

2021-12-22 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 22.12.2021 19:51, Andrew Schulman via Cygwin-apps wrote: On 22.12.2021 17:21, Andrew Schulman via Cygwin-apps wrote: Please add me as maintainer of two new unison packages: unison2.51+4.04.2 unison2.51+4.10.0 These will obsolete the current unison2.51 package. Thanks, Andrew added. Si

Re: New packages: unison2.51+4.04.2, unison2.51+4.10.0

2021-12-22 Thread Jon Turney
On 22/12/2021 18:51, Andrew Schulman via Cygwin-apps wrote: On 22.12.2021 17:21, Andrew Schulman via Cygwin-apps wrote: Please add me as maintainer of two new unison packages: unison2.51+4.04.2 unison2.51+4.10.0 These will obsolete the current unison2.51 package. Thanks, Andrew added. Si

Re: New packages: unison2.51+4.04.2, unison2.51+4.10.0

2021-12-22 Thread Andrew Schulman via Cygwin-apps
> On 22.12.2021 17:21, Andrew Schulman via Cygwin-apps wrote: > > Please add me as maintainer of two new unison packages: > > > > unison2.51+4.04.2 > > unison2.51+4.10.0 > > > > These will obsolete the current unison2.51 package. > > > > Thanks, Andrew > > > > added. Since I marked unison2.51

Re: New packages: unison2.51+4.04.2, unison2.51+4.10.0

2021-12-22 Thread Andrew Schulman via Cygwin-apps
> On 22.12.2021 17:21, Andrew Schulman via Cygwin-apps wrote: > > Please add me as maintainer of two new unison packages: > > > > unison2.51+4.04.2 > > unison2.51+4.10.0 > > > > These will obsolete the current unison2.51 package. > > > > Thanks, Andrew > > > > added. Thanks. > Question: why

Re: New packages: unison2.51+4.04.2, unison2.51+4.10.0

2021-12-22 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 22.12.2021 17:21, Andrew Schulman via Cygwin-apps wrote: Please add me as maintainer of two new unison packages: unison2.51+4.04.2 unison2.51+4.10.0 These will obsolete the current unison2.51 package. Thanks, Andrew added. Question: why Unison need all these versions ? $ grep "unison"

New packages: unison2.51+4.04.2, unison2.51+4.10.0

2021-12-22 Thread Andrew Schulman via Cygwin-apps
Please add me as maintainer of two new unison packages: unison2.51+4.04.2 unison2.51+4.10.0 These will obsolete the current unison2.51 package. Thanks, Andrew

Re: python-odf

2021-12-22 Thread Jon Turney
On 22/12/2021 13:17, Marco Atzeri wrote: On 20.12.2021 23:14, Marco Atzeri wrote: Hi Jon, while updating python-odf for the 3.9 round I noticed that for 1.4.1-1 I wrongly set a arch package instead of noarch as was for 0.9.5-1. To solve the issue I copied the content of /sourceware/ftp/anonftp

Re: python-odf

2021-12-22 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 20.12.2021 23:14, Marco Atzeri wrote: Hi Jon, while updating python-odf for the 3.9 round I noticed that for 1.4.1-1 I wrongly set a arch package instead of noarch as was for 0.9.5-1. To solve the issue I copied the content of /sourceware/ftp/anonftp/pub/cygwin/x86_64/release/python-odf on /