Re: [ITP] neomutt

2018-01-31 Thread Federico Kircheis
On 01/31/2018 06:55 PM, Jon Turney wrote: On 30/01/2018 05:56, Federico Kircheis wrote: On 01/28/2018 03:43 PM, Jon Turney wrote: On 28/01/2018 11:38, Federico Kircheis wrote: Name: Federico Kircheis Package: neomutt Done Uploaded. Please upload a x86 package as well. I'm sorry, I u

version anomalies

2018-01-31 Thread Jon Turney
With the setup 2.885 release candidate, when selecting 'sync' (dist-upgrade) mode, you may find you have some packages installed which setup wants to downgrade. Mostly, these are packages where a version was removed (or relabelled as test), and hasn't (yet) been superseded by a higher versio

Re: [ITP] neomutt

2018-01-31 Thread Jon Turney
On 30/01/2018 05:56, Federico Kircheis wrote: On 01/28/2018 03:43 PM, Jon Turney wrote: On 28/01/2018 11:38, Federico Kircheis wrote: Name: Federico Kircheis Package: neomutt Done Uploaded. Please upload a x86 package as well.

Re: setup 2.885 release candidate - please test

2018-01-31 Thread Jon Turney
On 30/01/2018 20:18, Jon Turney wrote: On 29/01/2018 19:19, Achim Gratz wrote: Jon Turney writes: [...]>>> - The "prereq" page showing dependencies which will be added is replaced by "problems" page showing problems found by the dependency solver, with default solutions. - A "confirm" page is

Re: setup 2.885 release candidate - please test

2018-01-31 Thread Jon Turney
On 30/01/2018 20:18, Jon Turney wrote: On 30/01/2018 18:49, Achim Gratz wrote: Another thing I noticed today is that when packages get upgraded the transaction list that gets printed to the console seems to always show the removal of the old package _after_ the installation of the new version.