Re: [ITP] FUSE 2.8

2016-09-08 Thread Bill Zissimopoulos
On 9/8/16, 5:01 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >On Sep 6 21:13, Bill Zissimopoulos wrote: >> On 9/5/16, 2:35 AM, Mark Geisert wrote: >>>I wasn't sure from Corinna's comments a while back (re hosting this >> >package) >> >whether she thought cygfuse should be part of Cygwin, as in placed in >>the >>

Re: [ITP] FUSE 2.8

2016-09-08 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Sep 6 21:13, Bill Zissimopoulos wrote: > On 9/5/16, 2:35 AM, Mark Geisert wrote: > >to cygfuse.cygport, etc. The doc inside some files might need updating. > > I agree with your naming changes. Recall that I basically ripped the > cygfuse package out of WinFsp so the names will have to be rev

Re: [ITP] FUSE 2.8

2016-09-08 Thread Mark Geisert
Herbert Stocker wrote: Maybe somebody wants to use WinFSP for Windows programs and Dokan for Cygwin programs. There should be some user setting for the case both are installed. Maybe some cygfuse-admin command could do the job. This kind of flexibility would be nice. We can of course only cont

cygfuse (was Re: [ITP] FUSE 2.8)

2016-09-08 Thread Mark Geisert
Mark Geisert wrote: [... some stuff ...] I've changed Subject: to reflect what's being discussed now. When we have a consensus cygfuse I'll issue an ITP for it. I've now updated the cygfuse repository on GitHub so it is more neutral about FUSE implementations. It can be seen at https://gith