Re: [ITP] FUSE 2.8

2016-07-22 Thread Bill Zissimopoulos
On 7/22/16, 11:01 PM, Marco Atzeri wrote: >On 23/07/2016 02:31, Bill Zissimopoulos wrote: >>Suppose I have a package XYZ that requires FUSE. Is it possible that the >> “FUSE” dependency can be satisfied by either winfsp-fuse or dokan-fuse? >> >> If that is not possible it looks like we would have

Re: [ITP] FUSE 2.8

2016-07-22 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 23/07/2016 02:31, Bill Zissimopoulos wrote: On 7/22/16, 12:57 PM, Marco Atzeri wrote: On 22/07/2016 19:58, Bill Zissimopoulos wrote: winfsp-fuse is a reasonable name. dokan-fuse also (IMHO) In the interest of moving things forward, I am happy to rename the package. Is it possible for a p

Re: [ITP] FUSE 2.8

2016-07-22 Thread Bill Zissimopoulos
On 7/22/16, 12:57 PM, Marco Atzeri wrote: >On 22/07/2016 19:58, Bill Zissimopoulos wrote: >>> winfsp-fuse is a reasonable name. >>> dokan-fuse also (IMHO) >> >> In the interest of moving things forward, I am happy to rename the >> package. Is it possible for a package with a name winfsp-fuse to >

Re: [ITP] FUSE 2.8

2016-07-22 Thread Bill Zissimopoulos
On 7/22/16, 12:56 PM, Adrien JUND wrote: >For information on your last release: curl -u "username" >https://api.github.com/repos/billziss-gh/winfsp/releases >=> winfsp-0.14.16197.msi - "download_count": 24 This is beginning to feel a bit weird. You seem to be rather obsessed with how many users

Re: [ITP] FUSE 2.8

2016-07-22 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 22/07/2016 19:58, Bill Zissimopoulos wrote: winfsp-fuse is a reasonable name. dokan-fuse also (IMHO) In the interest of moving things forward, I am happy to rename the package. Is it possible for a package with a name winfsp-fuse to satisfy a “fuse” dependency? Bill It is not clear to me

Re: [ITP] FUSE 2.8

2016-07-22 Thread Adrien JUND
Take a step back, Bill :) Here I am only concerned about a non-official fuse project "fuse" willing to use the fuse name and that would fool cygwin users. Since I never tested your solution, I only reuse your own sentence from dokan Google groups/reddit but if you continue to say that I spread ru

Re: [ITP] FUSE 2.8

2016-07-22 Thread Bill Zissimopoulos
>winfsp-fuse is a reasonable name. >dokan-fuse also (IMHO) In the interest of moving things forward, I am happy to rename the package. Is it possible for a package with a name winfsp-fuse to satisfy a “fuse” dependency? Bill

Re: [ITP] FUSE 2.8

2016-07-22 Thread Bill Zissimopoulos
On 7/22/16, 12:59 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >On Jul 21 22:11, Bill Zissimopoulos wrote: >> On 7/20/16, 1:52 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> >> >We just might still want to change the name to "no+body". >> > >> >What do others on this list think? What sounds better? >> > >> > "nodomain+nobody"

Re: [ITP] FUSE 2.8

2016-07-22 Thread Bill Zissimopoulos
On 7/22/16, 4:59 AM, Adrien JUND wrote: >The package should be renamed winfsp-fuse for give ability of cygwin >users to choose which solution they would like to use. Like >dokan-fuse, cbfs-fuse and other projects that offer the same >service... I am not opposed to renaming the package if that’s

Re: [ITP] FUSE 2.8

2016-07-22 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jul 22 14:53, Marco Atzeri wrote: > On 22/07/2016 14:30, Adrien JUND wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Here is Liryna from Dokan-dev community, our project Dokany have the > > same purpose of Bill project. > > Like WinFSP, it is able to mount FUSE filesystem on cygwin before WinFSP > > exist. > > > > I

Re: [ITP] FUSE 2.8

2016-07-22 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 22/07/2016 14:30, Adrien JUND wrote: Hi, Here is Liryna from Dokan-dev community, our project Dokany have the same purpose of Bill project. Like WinFSP, it is able to mount FUSE filesystem on cygwin before WinFSP exist. I would like to point out that naming WinFSP package "fuse" is not the r

Re: [ITP] FUSE 2.8

2016-07-22 Thread Adrien JUND
Hi, Here is Liryna from Dokan-dev community, our project Dokany have the same purpose of Bill project. Like WinFSP, it is able to mount FUSE filesystem on cygwin before WinFSP exist. I would like to point out that naming WinFSP package "fuse" is not the right way to integrate WinFSP in cygwin. T

Re: [ITP] FUSE 2.8

2016-07-22 Thread Adrien JUND
Hi, Here is Liryna from Dokan-dev community, our project Dokany have the same purpose of Bill project. Like WinFSP, it is able to mount FUSE filesystem on cygwin before WinFSP exist. I would like to point out that naming WinFSP package "fuse" is not the good way to integrate WinFSP in cygwin. Th

Re: [ITP] FUSE 2.8

2016-07-22 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jul 21 22:11, Bill Zissimopoulos wrote: > On 7/20/16, 1:52 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > >We just might still want to change the name to "no+body". > > > >What do others on this list think? What sounds better? > > > > "nodomain+nobody" or "no+body" > > Corinna, hi. > > I know you have aske