Alexey Sokolov writes:
> Hm, I'm not sure why autoreconf would do this (works for me though), but
> autoreconf is not required for ZNC anyway, as release tarballs already
> have ./configure script.
It's generally frowned upon to use this from the tarball if you can't
re-produce it at the build mac
23.07.2015 00:03, David Stacey :
> On 22/07/2015 00:53, Alexey Sokolov wrote:
>> David, how did you try to build it? What was the exact error message?
>> What do you change in Makefile.in to get it working?
>
> Attempting to compile znc-1.6.0-3 with cygport under Cygwin x86. It's
> worth saying th
On 23/07/15 00:03, David Stacey wrote:
That's because there's no 'libznc-1.6.dll.a' to link against. You need
to add the following to your link command when producing the shared DLL:
-Wl,--out-implib=libznc-1.6.dll.a
Again, I'll leave it to you to get this into the Makefile in a nice
way.
On 22/07/2015 00:53, Alexey Sokolov wrote:
David, how did you try to build it? What was the exact error message?
What do you change in Makefile.in to get it working?
Attempting to compile znc-1.6.0-3 with cygport under Cygwin x86. It's
worth saying that my Cygwin installation is about a month
22.07.2015 09:07, Corinna Vinschen:
> On Jul 22 00:32, Alexey Sokolov wrote:
>>> I've had a busy day and I'm a little tired, so I'm probably about to
>>> make a fool of myself on a public mailing list. Never mind :-) Three
>>> points on the znc package:
>>>
>>> - Unless I've missed something, all
> On 7/22/2015 3:10 PM, Andrew Schulman wrote:
> > Please make me the maintainer of the new perl-Stow package, which is being
> > split
> > off from stow. Thanks, Andrew.
> >
>
> Will you have a separate source package or not ?
>
> If the source package is the same you don't need a a separate l
Andrew Schulman writes:
> Please make me the maintainer of the new perl-Stow package, which is being
> split
> off from stow.
Are you really making a new package (based on CPAN)? If you just split
out a subpackage from the current stow package, the you don't need to do
an ITP and the sub-package
Ken Brown writes:
> In that case there's probably no reason for me to wait, unless Achim
> wants more time for maxima. Achim, what's your preference? If you
> want, you can install the new clisp from my repository
> (http://sanibeltranquility.com/cygwin) and use it to rebuild/test
> maxima. Ther
Corinna Vinschen writes:
> But then, for the time being, you can take care of this weird ordering
> with prev and curr markers, right?
Yes, I could, but since I test things with genini locally I'll have to
guess when to to that.
> Well, apart from "me, no perl", me neither. Nevertheless I looked
On 7/22/2015 3:10 PM, Andrew Schulman wrote:
Please make me the maintainer of the new perl-Stow package, which is being split
off from stow. Thanks, Andrew.
Will you have a separate source package or not ?
If the source package is the same you don't need a a separate line
just a split of cur
Please make me the maintainer of the new perl-Stow package, which is being split
off from stow. Thanks, Andrew.
On 7/22/2015 4:16 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jul 21 16:47, Ken Brown wrote:
On 7/21/2015 4:25 PM, Achim Gratz wrote:
Ken Brown writes:
I've rebuilt clisp on both 32-bit and 64-bit, now using libsigsegv on
64-bit, and I don't see any regressions. In particular, it passes the
test suite. I
On Jul 21 21:13, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen writes:
> > That's not sufficient, probably. I'm pretty sure you'd have to tweak
> > setup as well.
>
> Maybe, but the order setup itself imposes really comes into play only if
> the system has a version installed that is not in setup.ini any
On 7/20/2015 8:16 PM, Jon TURNEY wrote:
On 15/07/2015 15:24, Marco Atzeri wrote:
I spent a bit of time checking the real situation of the packages
still missing as 64 bit port.
After xdelta, bsdiff and iperf porting, without counting the few mingw
ones, the duplicates we are down to ~44.
Please
On Jul 21 16:47, Ken Brown wrote:
> On 7/21/2015 4:25 PM, Achim Gratz wrote:
> >Ken Brown writes:
> >>I've rebuilt clisp on both 32-bit and 64-bit, now using libsigsegv on
> >>64-bit, and I don't see any regressions. In particular, it passes the
> >>test suite. I don't know enough about clisp to
On Jul 22 00:32, Alexey Sokolov wrote:
> > I've had a busy day and I'm a little tired, so I'm probably about to
> > make a fool of myself on a public mailing list. Never mind :-) Three
> > points on the znc package:
> >
> > - Unless I've missed something, all this talk of DLL naming is a
> > lit
16 matches
Mail list logo
